Note to guests/lurkers of this site. To continue reading content on some of our boards you will need to create an account.

Registration is free and easy, just remember your password and check back after your account has been approved by an administrator.

Please use the "contact us" link at the bottom of the page if you have any issues.

Sam Darnold mitigation project

A place to discuss the MN Vikings
Post Reply
BuDG123
Posts: 6969
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2019 6:57 am

Re: Sam Darnold mitigation project

Post by BuDG123 »

Darnold has sucked against split safeties when trying to force it to Jefferson but has over 2x the success when Jefferson goes against single high this year. All 3 picks against Jacksonville came when he tried to force a ball to Jefferson when Jacksonville had the safeties split on Jefferson.
User avatar
Slap Shot
Posts: 46565
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 12:17 pm
Location: Here there and everywhere

Re: Sam Darnold mitigation project

Post by Slap Shot »

JAX surprisingly ranks 9th best for Y/C allowed, but yeah 3.9 isn't going to help your QB nor your offense.
User avatar
Tmoney
Posts: 7831
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 10:14 am

Re: Sam Darnold mitigation project

Post by Tmoney »

https://x.com/danorlovsky7/status/1857095822292168897

Dan does a 3 minute break down of his 3 picks last Sunday.

Video proof of what we have been saying. Holding the ball, than forcing it to Jefferson way to late.
Nico
Posts: 34
Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2024 3:28 pm

Re: Sam Darnold mitigation project

Post by Nico »

Tmoney wrote: Thu Nov 14, 2024 2:25 pm https://x.com/danorlovsky7/status/1857095822292168897

Dan does a 3 minute break down of his 3 picks last Sunday.

Video proof of what we have been saying. Holding the ball, than forcing it to Jefferson way to late.

Well, at least he didn’t throw five bonehead pics like Jared Goff. Haha
Norn_Iron
Posts: 3728
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2018 7:22 pm

Re: Sam Darnold mitigation project

Post by Norn_Iron »

Tmoney wrote: Thu Nov 14, 2024 2:25 pm https://x.com/danorlovsky7/status/1857095822292168897

Dan does a 3 minute break down of his 3 picks last Sunday.

Video proof of what we have been saying. Holding the ball, than forcing it to Jefferson way to late.
Thanks for sharing

Those were 3 terrible throws.

The 2nd in particular for me. The WR had separation running to the corner and he threw it behind him.

The 1st one was bad because he stared JJ down so much that it was the LB on the other side of the field that was able to come across and make the interception

And the third needed to be to the back of the endzone. It was asking to be picked off where he put it. Could also be on JJ if he ran the route wrong, but I doubt he did and it was just a shit throw
I'm Northern Irish, I've got this.....
User avatar
minnemike
KFAN Rube Chat Hall of Fame Member
Posts: 13704
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 8:10 pm

Re: Sam Darnold mitigation project

Post by minnemike »

Sam's split with passing in blitz vs non-blitz is striking. He's infinitely better vs the blitz. What does this mean?

I think it means he still lacks the confidence with tight throws. He needs to see his guy wide open to hit the mark. JAX blitzed him a total of one time.

Sam needs to find a way to make tight throws into coverage when given plenty of time. Seems like this is when plays devolve into more adlib type of plays where the route was covered and he needs to find guys off schedule. He may never be good at this.
User avatar
Beef Supreme
Posts: 84427
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2017 11:49 pm
Location: House of Representin'

Re: Sam Darnold mitigation project

Post by Beef Supreme »

Norn_Iron wrote: Fri Nov 15, 2024 7:46 am
Tmoney wrote: Thu Nov 14, 2024 2:25 pm https://x.com/danorlovsky7/status/1857095822292168897

Dan does a 3 minute break down of his 3 picks last Sunday.

Video proof of what we have been saying. Holding the ball, than forcing it to Jefferson way to late.
Thanks for sharing

Those were 3 terrible throws.

The 2nd in particular for me. The WR had separation running to the corner and he threw it behind him.

The 1st one was bad because he stared JJ down so much that it was the LB on the other side of the field that was able to come across and make the interception

And the third needed to be to the back of the endzone. It was asking to be picked off where he put it. Could also be on JJ if he ran the route wrong, but I doubt he did and it was just a shit throw
Second one could have been to the back pylon or thrown farther to the boundary. Either one gives JJ a chance and makes a pick really unlikely. Instead he throws it short and too far to the numbers and it’s an easy pick.
My grandfather killed Nazis.
Norn_Iron
Posts: 3728
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2018 7:22 pm

Re: Sam Darnold mitigation project

Post by Norn_Iron »

Beef Supreme wrote: Fri Nov 15, 2024 6:46 pm
Norn_Iron wrote: Fri Nov 15, 2024 7:46 am
Tmoney wrote: Thu Nov 14, 2024 2:25 pm https://x.com/danorlovsky7/status/1857095822292168897

Dan does a 3 minute break down of his 3 picks last Sunday.

Video proof of what we have been saying. Holding the ball, than forcing it to Jefferson way to late.
Thanks for sharing

Those were 3 terrible throws.

The 2nd in particular for me. The WR had separation running to the corner and he threw it behind him.

The 1st one was bad because he stared JJ down so much that it was the LB on the other side of the field that was able to come across and make the interception

And the third needed to be to the back of the endzone. It was asking to be picked off where he put it. Could also be on JJ if he ran the route wrong, but I doubt he did and it was just a shit throw
Second one could have been to the back pylon or thrown farther to the boundary. Either one gives JJ a chance and makes a pick really unlikely. Instead he throws it short and too far to the numbers and it’s an easy pick.
Think that was the 3rd one

Anyway I think the most concerning thing is, they blitzed once that entire game.
That screams let Darnold have the ball and fuck it up

That is not good
I'm Northern Irish, I've got this.....
User avatar
Beef Supreme
Posts: 84427
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2017 11:49 pm
Location: House of Representin'

Re: Sam Darnold mitigation project

Post by Beef Supreme »

Norn_Iron wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 6:50 am
Beef Supreme wrote: Fri Nov 15, 2024 6:46 pm
Norn_Iron wrote: Fri Nov 15, 2024 7:46 am

Thanks for sharing

Those were 3 terrible throws.

The 2nd in particular for me. The WR had separation running to the corner and he threw it behind him.

The 1st one was bad because he stared JJ down so much that it was the LB on the other side of the field that was able to come across and make the interception

And the third needed to be to the back of the endzone. It was asking to be picked off where he put it. Could also be on JJ if he ran the route wrong, but I doubt he did and it was just a shit throw
Second one could have been to the back pylon or thrown farther to the boundary. Either one gives JJ a chance and makes a pick really unlikely. Instead he throws it short and too far to the numbers and it’s an easy pick.
Think that was the 3rd one

Anyway I think the most concerning thing is, they blitzed once that entire game.
That screams let Darnold have the ball and fuck it up

That is not good
I think you’re right.
My grandfather killed Nazis.
Small Hands
Posts: 8815
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 8:08 pm

Re: Sam Darnold mitigation project

Post by Small Hands »

Norn_Iron wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 6:50 am
Beef Supreme wrote: Fri Nov 15, 2024 6:46 pm
Norn_Iron wrote: Fri Nov 15, 2024 7:46 am

Thanks for sharing

Those were 3 terrible throws.

The 2nd in particular for me. The WR had separation running to the corner and he threw it behind him.

The 1st one was bad because he stared JJ down so much that it was the LB on the other side of the field that was able to come across and make the interception

And the third needed to be to the back of the endzone. It was asking to be picked off where he put it. Could also be on JJ if he ran the route wrong, but I doubt he did and it was just a shit throw
Second one could have been to the back pylon or thrown farther to the boundary. Either one gives JJ a chance and makes a pick really unlikely. Instead he throws it short and too far to the numbers and it’s an easy pick.
Think that was the 3rd one

Anyway I think the most concerning thing is, they blitzed once that entire game.
That screams let Darnold have the ball and fuck it up

That is not good
Bingo
User avatar
Beef Supreme
Posts: 84427
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2017 11:49 pm
Location: House of Representin'

Re: Sam Darnold mitigation project

Post by Beef Supreme »




Unlikely this happens. I’m sure he’ll get offers to start, or at least have an open competition to start, elsewhere.


But this is the right attitude by the Vikings, based on what we’ve seen.
My grandfather killed Nazis.
User avatar
weimy froob
Posts: 113502
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 11:10 am

Re: Sam Darnold mitigation project

Post by weimy froob »

Beef Supreme wrote: Sat Nov 23, 2024 4:13 pm


Unlikely this happens. I’m sure he’ll get offers to start, or at least have an open competition to start, elsewhere.


But this is the right attitude by the Vikings, based on what we’ve seen.
foregone conclusion weeks ago. now heal up, JJ.
User avatar
weimy froob
Posts: 113502
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 11:10 am

Re: Sam Darnold mitigation project

Post by weimy froob »

sammy boy wasn't an albatross yesterday. he came up big in that OT--especially when you remember he took that seven yard sack deep in our territory on the first play of the drive but was able to turn a second and 17 situation into a manageable third and 10 and then made the cold blooded connection for the first down. the field tilted downward after that one. i think it was hockenson who made snagged that second down completion, which was slightly behind him in tight coverage. big game for the TE too.
ChrisPaulGeorgeHill
Posts: 893
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2019 9:54 am

Re: Sam Darnold mitigation project

Post by ChrisPaulGeorgeHill »

Well, aside from Darnold trying to force it a couple times to JJ, I think we got a taste of what Darnold is going to be able to do if he takes what’s given to him.

Bears were single covering Addison most of the game.

Darnold took advantage of that.

Bears would single coverage TJ and even at times disregard him until it was too late.

Darnold took advantage of that.

Bears would completely disregard our WR3s and WR4s most of the time.

Darnold took advantage of that.

Bears were so focused on stopping JJ they basically said to Darnold, “we’re taking JJ away from you. Do something about that.”

Darnold did.

Hopefully Darnold learns from this game and has figured out the obvious.

If they take JJ away from you, somebody is open. Find that person.

If this becomes the norm for him, it builds his confidence. So when something bad happens, I hope he remembers he’s got other guys that are super talented he can go to when JJ isn’t available.
User avatar
weimy froob
Posts: 113502
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 11:10 am

Re: Sam Darnold mitigation project

Post by weimy froob »

NFL Winners

Sam Darnold: Sunday could have been an awful loss for the Minnesota Vikings. In the final minute of regulation, leading 27-16, the Vikings allowed a touchdown, 2-point conversion, onside kick and a game-tying field goal to the Chicago Bears. That sent the game to overtime. It would have been a miserable collapse.

Darnold helped save the day. He had 330 yards and two touchdowns, and orchestrated a game-winning drive in overtime. The Vikings kicked a field goal to pull out the 30-27 win. It was more dramatic at the end than they hoped, but it was still a win.

The Vikings are 9-2 after the win, hoping for the Lions to slip up in the NFC North. Sunday could have been a huge setback for them. Darnold started the season strong, had a couple rough games with turnovers but started to right himself last week. Sunday showed that he's back on the right track.
User avatar
witljon
Posts: 22657
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2018 11:57 am

Re: Sam Darnold mitigation project

Post by witljon »

weimy froob wrote: Mon Nov 25, 2024 7:31 pm The Vikings are 9-2 after the win, hoping for the Lions to slip up in the NFC North. Sunday could have been a huge setback for them. Darnold started the season strong, had a couple rough games with turnovers but started to right himself last week. Sunday showed that he's back on the right track.
It sure appears the chances of the Vikings slipping is much better than the Lions doing it. The Lions are playing really good right now. They’ve outscored their last 3 opponents (Texans/Jaguars/Colts) 53-0 in the second half. The Lions offensive line is proving to be the NFLs best. They’re hitting on all cylinders. Hopefully they’ve peaked too soon.
Bring ya ass!
hategreenticemase
Posts: 24854
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2017 6:34 pm

Re: Sam Darnold mitigation project

Post by hategreenticemase »

witljon wrote: Tue Nov 26, 2024 7:53 am
weimy froob wrote: Mon Nov 25, 2024 7:31 pm The Vikings are 9-2 after the win, hoping for the Lions to slip up in the NFC North. Sunday could have been a huge setback for them. Darnold started the season strong, had a couple rough games with turnovers but started to right himself last week. Sunday showed that he's back on the right track.
It sure appears the chances of the Vikings slipping is much better than the Lions doing it. The Lions are playing really good right now. They’ve outscored their last 3 opponents (Texans/Jaguars/Colts) 53-0 in the second half. The Lions offensive line is proving to be the NFLs best. They’re hitting on all cylinders. Hopefully they’ve peaked too soon.
Are injuries starting to add up for them? I had not heard this but a buddy of mine was telling me their left tackle and David Montgomery left the game Sunday? As I told him, David Montgomery is a really good player, but this might be the classic Barry Switzer line from 1989 when they were playing Oklahoma State and all American Thurman Thomas was coming to town and he told his team no matter what you do don't injure Thurman Thomas cuz you don't want anything to do with their backup (Barry Sanders). :lol:

Gibbs is a stud so not sure that one matters, But left tackle when you have a statue for a quarterback is a fairly big deal. Anyone know anything about that?

One thing I was thinking is is at least Caleb Williams is last couple weeks starting to play well to where maybe it can at least be interesting otherwise holy f*** is the NFL trying to punish us Thursday or what? Golly, I can hardly wait for the Giants cowboy game. :lol:
User avatar
salamander
Posts: 24886
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 12:39 pm

Re: Sam Darnold mitigation project

Post by salamander »

I'd like to see CJ Ham get the ball like 2-3 times a game. At least 1 pass.
Good things happen when Ham gets the ball.

1st and 5? FB run up the middle for like 2-3 yards.
3rd and 1? FB
Let's see a FB screen pass, or swing pass or angle route every once in awhile.

This obviously doesn't change a lot during the game but it adds a needed wrinkle.
Mammoth De-extinction Project & the successful De-extinction of Dire wolves
https://colossal.com/
Spoiler:
Ben Lamm on his De-extinction project (Interviewed by Joe Rogan)

Click here to learn how to add YouTube Videos to your phpBB forum
hategreenticemase
Posts: 24854
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2017 6:34 pm

Re: Sam Darnold mitigation project

Post by hategreenticemase »

salamander wrote: Wed Nov 27, 2024 9:43 am I'd like to see CJ Ham get the ball like 2-3 times a game. At least 1 pass.
Good things happen when Ham gets the ball.

1st and 5? FB run up the middle for like 2-3 yards.
3rd and 1? FB
Let's see a FB screen pass, or swing pass or angle route every once in awhile.

This obviously doesn't change a lot during the game but it adds a needed wrinkle.
So you've been breaking down some of these games, evaluating our offense where it succeeds where it struggles etc, and your conclusion was our least skilled skill player, who's essentially here for special teams and to block on offense, needs to be more involved with touches in the game? Is this post because you know you won't be here tomorrow to pull any salamanders? :lol:
User avatar
Slap Shot
Posts: 46565
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 12:17 pm
Location: Here there and everywhere

Re: Sam Darnold mitigation project

Post by Slap Shot »

Without looking I'd be willing to bet the Vikings are outscoring their opponents early, but scoring the final 2-3 quarters (at least the past several games) has been an issue. For a team that wants to make the playoffs and go into them with momentum they need to solver for that. Especially when it comes to coaching.
User avatar
The Lizard King
Posts: 28588
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2018 11:01 am

Re: Sam Darnold mitigation project

Post by The Lizard King »

weimy froob wrote: Sat Nov 23, 2024 5:00 pm
Beef Supreme wrote: Sat Nov 23, 2024 4:13 pm


Unlikely this happens. I’m sure he’ll get offers to start, or at least have an open competition to start, elsewhere.


But this is the right attitude by the Vikings, based on what we’ve seen.
foregone conclusion weeks ago. now heal up, JJ.
I'm not sure why the Vikings are going all-in with a rookie QB with zero real game experience. :thinking:
"If you ever need anything, please don't hesitate to ask someone else first." - KDC
Oriole81
Posts: 31881
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2018 4:48 pm

Re: Sam Darnold mitigation project

Post by Oriole81 »

The Lizard King wrote: Wed Nov 27, 2024 12:24 pm
weimy froob wrote: Sat Nov 23, 2024 5:00 pm
Beef Supreme wrote: Sat Nov 23, 2024 4:13 pm


Unlikely this happens. I’m sure he’ll get offers to start, or at least have an open competition to start, elsewhere.


But this is the right attitude by the Vikings, based on what we’ve seen.
foregone conclusion weeks ago. now heal up, JJ.
I'm not sure why the Vikings are going all-in with a rookie QB with zero real game experience. :thinking:
If you're not going to have a TRULY ELITE QB, then you're just as better off having a rookie scale contract QB, and building out the rest of your team.
KOC is supposed to be a special QB developer, so utilize him to identify a preferred prospect, and then develop him accordingly.
2020 All Time NBA Draft

A Iverson, K Irving
J Havlicek, M Ginobili, M Richmond
D Wilkins, B Bowen
T Duncan, B McAdoo
H Olajuwon, W Unseld, A Sabonis
User avatar
morneaumvp
Posts: 3176
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2017 8:23 pm

Re: Sam Darnold mitigation project

Post by morneaumvp »

Anyone think Darnold would entertain a Viking friendly deal to stay here, or would he cash out in Las Vegas?
User avatar
minnemike
KFAN Rube Chat Hall of Fame Member
Posts: 13704
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 8:10 pm

Re: Sam Darnold mitigation project

Post by minnemike »

morneaumvp wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 2:19 pm Anyone think Darnold would entertain a Viking friendly deal to stay here, or would he cash out in Las Vegas?
I think there is a chance if he would take a similar $10 mil, maybe $15 mil deal. And then he would need to accept a real QB competition for QB1. Of course, that has it's own pros and cons.

But I have to think in the end, he wants a full size pay day, preferably with a QB friendly system but really whatever the best offer is.
SKOLMN
Posts: 3932
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2017 8:15 pm

Re: Sam Darnold mitigation project

Post by SKOLMN »

morneaumvp wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 2:19 pm Anyone think Darnold would entertain a Viking friendly deal to stay here, or would he cash out in Las Vegas?
Depends on your definition of friendly deal. I don’t think he’ll necessarily opt for the largest contract offered like cousins did as long as he gets a somewhat reasonable deal. I think playing time will be more important to him. He ain’t gonna re-sign with us to jump into a qb competition. He wants to use this year as an assurance to teams that he can ball and parlay it into a starting gig somewhere.
Oriole81
Posts: 31881
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2018 4:48 pm

Re: Sam Darnold mitigation project

Post by Oriole81 »

Darnold deserves to get paid.
He's ONLY made $65M, so he should seek out a lucrative extension. This may be his only chance for his career.

A Vikes friendly deal could allow us to get creative with terms and cap hits, but that's going to have to come with guaranteed money.
2020 All Time NBA Draft

A Iverson, K Irving
J Havlicek, M Ginobili, M Richmond
D Wilkins, B Bowen
T Duncan, B McAdoo
H Olajuwon, W Unseld, A Sabonis
User avatar
Beetlejuice
Posts: 8073
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2021 2:56 pm

Re: Sam Darnold mitigation project

Post by Beetlejuice »

morneaumvp wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 2:19 pm Anyone think Darnold would entertain a Viking friendly deal to stay here, or would he cash out in Las Vegas?
There’s two teams that could make a run at Darnold in the offseason that nobody talk about.

1) Pittsburgh - Fields isn’t the answer and Wilson isn’t going to take the vet minimum again. Instead of giving old man Wilson a big payday, they could decide to give Darnold the money and a chance to be their long term starter with Fields as the backup. This would be my number one option if I was Darnold.

2)Indy - Richardson hasn’t come close to showing that he’s a franchise QB. Indy could pay Darnold to be insurance with a chance to become the long term starter there.

SF is a big wild card. It’s extremely unlikely, but I wouldn’t put it past them to bring Darnold back if they don’t want to pay Purdy big money.


Any other team would be a bridge role for Darnold unless they decide to make him the de facto starter and not draft a rookie QB. Those teams would be:

Vegas
New York Giants
Tennessee (Plan B if they ain’t sold on Levis)

I doubt he’s go back to the Jets or Carolina if they called.
Who me?
User avatar
weimy froob
Posts: 113502
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 11:10 am

Re: Sam Darnold mitigation project

Post by weimy froob »

i doubt he's a viking next year, but i'll give him props again for that fourth down completion to JJ. a cold blooded connection.
RayRay82
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2024 6:26 pm

Re: Sam Darnold mitigation project

Post by RayRay82 »

They almost have to bring him back don’t they? I’m not sure how you can look the other players in the locker room and go another direction after the year he’s having, there would be mutiny.
hategreenticemase
Posts: 24854
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2017 6:34 pm

Re: Sam Darnold mitigation project

Post by hategreenticemase »

Beetlejuice wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 4:29 pm
morneaumvp wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 2:19 pm Anyone think Darnold would entertain a Viking friendly deal to stay here, or would he cash out in Las Vegas?
There’s two teams that could make a run at Darnold in the offseason that nobody talk about.

1) Pittsburgh - Fields isn’t the answer and Wilson isn’t going to take the vet minimum again. Instead of giving old man Wilson a big payday, they could decide to give Darnold the money and a chance to be their long term starter with Fields as the backup. This would be my number one option if I was Darnold.

2)Indy - Richardson hasn’t come close to showing that he’s a franchise QB. Indy could pay Darnold to be insurance with a chance to become the long term starter there.

SF is a big wild card. It’s extremely unlikely, but I wouldn’t put it past them to bring Darnold back if they don’t want to pay Purdy big money.


Any other team would be a bridge role for Darnold unless they decide to make him the de facto starter and not draft a rookie QB. Those teams would be:

Vegas
New York Giants
Tennessee (Plan B if they ain’t sold on Levis)

I doubt he’s go back to the Jets or Carolina if they called.
Indy I dont see. Why would he go there when they have every reason to want Richardson to succeed? And why would Indy pay him starters money? That doesn't make sense.

It will be interesting to see how it plays out but I would imagine he's going to have several suitors...
Post Reply