Note to guests/lurkers of this site. To continue reading content on some of our boards you will need to create an account.
Registration is free and easy, just remember your password and check back after your account has been approved by an administrator.
Please use the "contact us" link at the bottom of the page if you have any issues.
Registration is free and easy, just remember your password and check back after your account has been approved by an administrator.
Please use the "contact us" link at the bottom of the page if you have any issues.
Naz Reid Back - 3 years, $42 million
- weimy froob
- Posts: 90575
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 11:10 am
- T_J
- Posts: 9720
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 8:53 am
Re: Naz Reid Back - 3 years, $42 million
I wonder if he had offers anywhere else for similar with a better shot at minutes. Or if there was a wink wink, there’ll be plenty of minutes here for this dollar amount, if you catch my…drift.
- witljon
- Posts: 16421
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2018 11:57 am
Re: Naz Reid Back - 3 years, $42 million
Maybe, but going against starters would not be as easy for him as bench players.Mnwild1128 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2023 9:07 pmYeah but imagine what his numbers would be on a team like the Spurs where he is getting 30 minutes per night. He could easily average 18/7/1.5
- Mplsfonz
- Posts: 5429
- Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2019 8:49 am
Re: Naz Reid Back - 3 years, $42 million
That would be best case IMO. Thing is, they need to match salaries. Scoot should be about 9 mil this year, they would have to match about 25-27 million give or take. Would they part with Simon or Grant to match? (Not sure if Grant is even under contract.)Small Hands wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2023 9:25 pm
Yeah… he definitely didn’t give us a discount. That’s about as high as I’d want to go for him. Hopefully, this spells a Towns trade. Cross your fingers that Portland buckles and gives us Scoot.
Either way, don't give up picks, get as much back as you can. Either way, a Towns for Scoot seems like the best way forward.
- Mplsfonz
- Posts: 5429
- Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2019 8:49 am
Re: Naz Reid Back - 3 years, $42 million
Just as long as it's not a Joe Smith deal. I think Towns would be okay with this move. He knows he isn't the alpha dog here anymore, and going to Dame time would give him a reason to accept his sidekick position. My only problem with this, (if healthy) we would see him 4 times a year, and we all know how those things turn out. Or, maybe he is as soft as they say and we can count on 4 wins.
-
- Posts: 25533
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2018 4:48 pm
Re: Naz Reid Back - 3 years, $42 million
Playing time is never guaranteed, so I don't see anything that they could nip us on.Mplsfonz wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2023 9:54 amJust as long as it's not a Joe Smith deal. I think Towns would be okay with this move. He knows he isn't the alpha dog here anymore, and going to Dame time would give him a reason to accept his sidekick position. My only problem with this, (if healthy) we would see him 4 times a year, and we all know how those things turn out. Or, maybe he is as soft as they say and we can count on 4 wins.
The problem with the Joe Smith deal was the assurances of future money because we couldn't afford to pay him in year one what he expected, which is a problem.
Since we had Naz's right, we could pay him whatever he needed in order to justify him passing over FA, so there's no CBA circumventing.
2020 All Time NBA Draft
A Iverson, K Irving
J Havlicek, M Ginobili, M Richmond
D Wilkins, B Bowen
T Duncan, B McAdoo
H Olajuwon, W Unseld, A Sabonis
A Iverson, K Irving
J Havlicek, M Ginobili, M Richmond
D Wilkins, B Bowen
T Duncan, B McAdoo
H Olajuwon, W Unseld, A Sabonis
- Beef Supreme
- Posts: 71535
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2017 11:49 pm
- Location: House of Representin'
Re: Naz Reid Back - 3 years, $42 million
Towns has never had a problem accepting a secondary or complimentary role. In the Butler year, he was third on the team in FGA/game (behind Buckets and Wiggins), despite being far and away the most efficient offensive player of the 3. If he wanted to make noise about that he could have and would have had an argument. But he didn't. No reason he won't be perfectly content in that role behind Edwards. Or, for the sake of the Portland trade fantasy, Dame.Mplsfonz wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2023 9:54 amJust as long as it's not a Joe Smith deal. I think Towns would be okay with this move. He knows he isn't the alpha dog here anymore, and going to Dame time would give him a reason to accept his sidekick position. My only problem with this, (if healthy) we would see him 4 times a year, and we all know how those things turn out. Or, maybe he is as soft as they say and we can count on 4 wins.
“When stupidity is considered patriotism, it is unsafe to be intelligent.”
- Isaac Asimov
- Isaac Asimov
- Mplsfonz
- Posts: 5429
- Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2019 8:49 am
Re: Naz Reid Back - 3 years, $42 million
I was referring to the quote wink-wink deal with Portland. I don't think any GM would be as dumb as those who put a wink-wink deal in writing like Taylor did.Oriole81 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2023 10:10 amPlaying time is never guaranteed, so I don't see anything that they could nip us on.Mplsfonz wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2023 9:54 amJust as long as it's not a Joe Smith deal. I think Towns would be okay with this move. He knows he isn't the alpha dog here anymore, and going to Dame time would give him a reason to accept his sidekick position. My only problem with this, (if healthy) we would see him 4 times a year, and we all know how those things turn out. Or, maybe he is as soft as they say and we can count on 4 wins.
The problem with the Joe Smith deal was the assurances of future money because we couldn't afford to pay him in year one what he expected, which is a problem.
Since we had Naz's right, we could pay him whatever he needed in order to justify him passing over FA, so there's no CBA circumventing.
- Mplsfonz
- Posts: 5429
- Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2019 8:49 am
Re: Naz Reid Back - 3 years, $42 million
I can agree with that. At the time of the Butthead era, I think he forced his will on Towns, and Towns was only a young player still. Once Butt left, I think he felt it was his team considering the size of the contract. Again, I could be wro...Wroooon....Wrong, just seems like he enjoys being the leader. Maybe all the games missed, he may have accepted his role as second. The Rudy trade forcing him to a different position could have felt like a slap too.Beef Supreme wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2023 10:27 amTowns has never had a problem accepting a secondary or complimentary role. In the Butler year, he was third on the team in FGA/game (behind Buckets and Wiggins), despite being far and away the most efficient offensive player of the 3. If he wanted to make noise about that he could have and would have had an argument. But he didn't. No reason he won't be perfectly content in that role behind Edwards. Or, for the sake of the Portland trade fantasy, Dame.Mplsfonz wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2023 9:54 amJust as long as it's not a Joe Smith deal. I think Towns would be okay with this move. He knows he isn't the alpha dog here anymore, and going to Dame time would give him a reason to accept his sidekick position. My only problem with this, (if healthy) we would see him 4 times a year, and we all know how those things turn out. Or, maybe he is as soft as they say and we can count on 4 wins.
Who knows? But I tried like hell to wait on Towns, but after the core of Wiggins/LaVine and Towns broke up, seems like he doesn't have the fire to lead. Just my humble 2 cents.
-
- Posts: 25533
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2018 4:48 pm
Re: Naz Reid Back - 3 years, $42 million
I get what you guys were trying to say, but even if they told him they had a deal in place as an enticement, that wouldn't be against any rules.Mplsfonz wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2023 10:31 amI was referring to the quote wink-wink deal with Portland. I don't think any GM would be as dumb as those who put a wink-wink deal in writing like Taylor did.Oriole81 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2023 10:10 amPlaying time is never guaranteed, so I don't see anything that they could nip us on.Mplsfonz wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2023 9:54 am Just as long as it's not a Joe Smith deal. I think Towns would be okay with this move. He knows he isn't the alpha dog here anymore, and going to Dame time would give him a reason to accept his sidekick position. My only problem with this, (if healthy) we would see him 4 times a year, and we all know how those things turn out. Or, maybe he is as soft as they say and we can count on 4 wins.
The problem with the Joe Smith deal was the assurances of future money because we couldn't afford to pay him in year one what he expected, which is a problem.
Since we had Naz's right, we could pay him whatever he needed in order to justify him passing over FA, so there's no CBA circumventing.
Heck, even putting in writing wouldn't be against any rules in this case as the CBA mentions nothing about playing time.
2020 All Time NBA Draft
A Iverson, K Irving
J Havlicek, M Ginobili, M Richmond
D Wilkins, B Bowen
T Duncan, B McAdoo
H Olajuwon, W Unseld, A Sabonis
A Iverson, K Irving
J Havlicek, M Ginobili, M Richmond
D Wilkins, B Bowen
T Duncan, B McAdoo
H Olajuwon, W Unseld, A Sabonis
-
- KFAN Rube Chat Hall of Fame Member
- Posts: 15889
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2017 1:38 pm
Re: Naz Reid Back - 3 years, $42 million
I am shocked he didn't test the market at this point.... he must truly like it here though and told his agent let's just do this and see what happens. Two years 28 mil ain't bad for the next two seasons and he can decide to test the market then if he wants to.
- Moses Scurry
- Posts: 16638
- Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2017 12:48 pm
Re: Naz Reid Back - 3 years, $42 million
28 million dollars "ain't bad".
The absurdity of pro athlete salaries.
The absurdity of pro athlete salaries.
- T_J
- Posts: 9720
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 8:53 am
Re: Naz Reid Back - 3 years, $42 million
Yeah, I would have thought he’d want a more obvious larger role for similar money so he can get a bigger deal in a couple years. Right now he’s a sometimes starter, but obviously 3rd on the depth chart.HeHateMe wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2023 11:00 amI am shocked he didn't test the market at this point.... he must truly like it here though and told his agent let's just do this and see what happens. Two years 28 mil ain't bad for the next two seasons and he can decide to test the market then if he wants to.
Maybe he just truly loves Sota, or he knows one of our high priced centers will be gone in a year. They opened the Hoop Collective talking Naz today actually.
-
- Posts: 3430
- Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2021 9:47 am
- Location: 2nd username. Been on here since around 2008-ish
Re: Naz Reid Back - 3 years, $42 million
Heard a call camw down to Connely from Glenn and or the other partial owners to get Reid signed now before free agency. Since both sides were still millions off even after the draft. I do not like this meddling by ownership. Even if it meant keeping a player that i like and wanted to keep. If true this is two moves that i am pretty certain were made by the ownership collection. They must have known Connely was a simp/beta personality that they could hire and force to do their biddings. I couldn't be more disgusted.
-
- ***Official Gibby Award Winner - November 2018***
- Posts: 44501
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 2:10 pm
Re: Naz Reid Back - 3 years, $42 million
Any chance this was his market? He’s a decent player but sports message boards fans tend to overrate their teams players.
He’s not a starter on a good team at least as of yet. Decent player that has shown some promise to get better but I do understand that the NBA overpays a lot of bums.
I honestly don’t care about keeping him or letting him go if it doesn’t involve Carl. I like keeping Reid for a way cheaper price and moving on from Carl but if they keep Carl long term. this isn’t much of a factor to me.
Secondly to the people saying we can trade Naz at the deadline, his value can’t be much. A 2nd rounder? A very low end 1st at the very best?
I hope they move Towns and keep Reid but Towns better not get hurt again this year or his value will be at an all time low especially with his big bucks kicking in.
He’s not a starter on a good team at least as of yet. Decent player that has shown some promise to get better but I do understand that the NBA overpays a lot of bums.
I honestly don’t care about keeping him or letting him go if it doesn’t involve Carl. I like keeping Reid for a way cheaper price and moving on from Carl but if they keep Carl long term. this isn’t much of a factor to me.
Secondly to the people saying we can trade Naz at the deadline, his value can’t be much. A 2nd rounder? A very low end 1st at the very best?
I hope they move Towns and keep Reid but Towns better not get hurt again this year or his value will be at an all time low especially with his big bucks kicking in.
“We are nonviolent with people who are nonviolent with us.”
— Malcolm X
The Puppet Master
— Malcolm X
The Puppet Master
-
- Posts: 3430
- Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2021 9:47 am
- Location: 2nd username. Been on here since around 2008-ish
Re: Naz Reid Back - 3 years, $42 million
Players worse than him were going for 3 to 5...... 2nd round picks at last years deadline. It was a record deadline for 2nd rounders moved. I think a lotto protected first is even possible and likely for him. That is my unbiased opinion based on historical evidence of current nba players. I always try to aim at fair values for players on my teams.Sergeant Rubetube wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2023 8:23 pm Any chance this was his market? He’s a decent player but sports message boards fans tend to overrate their teams players.
He’s not a starter on a good team at least as of yet. Decent player that has shown some promise to get better but I do understand that the NBA overpays a lot of bums.
I honestly don’t care about keeping him or letting him go if it doesn’t involve Carl. I like keeping Reid for a way cheaper price and moving on from Carl but if they keep Carl long term. this isn’t much of a factor to me.
Secondly to the people saying we can trade Naz at the deadline, his value can’t be much. A 2nd rounder? A very low end 1st at the very best?
I hope they move Towns and keep Reid but Towns better not get hurt again this year or his value will be at an all time low especially with his big bucks kicking in.
The MLE cap was at 12.4 million. We offered him almost 500k above that to retain him. Rounded up for 2023 it comes to 13 million. But is closer to 12.8 or 12.9
-
- Posts: 4169
- Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2017 7:32 am
Re: Naz Reid Back - 3 years, $42 million
After the Naz signing, the Wolves tweeted a montage of people simply saying "Naz Reid." The montage included the head coach, Grady, Jim Pete, Ant, Rudy, and other Wolves players. Noticeably absent was KAT.
- Jimi_Thing
- Posts: 15798
- Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2017 6:53 pm
Re: Naz Reid Back - 3 years, $42 million
If given the choice between Naz & Vucevic who would my fellow Rubes go with?
If given the choice between Naz with a 3yr/42 million or Vucevic with a 3/year 60 million, who would my fellow Rubes go with?
If given the choice between Naz with a 3yr/42 million or Vucevic with a 3/year 60 million, who would my fellow Rubes go with?
- somuchyummy
- Posts: 27244
- Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2017 9:14 pm
Re: Naz Reid Back - 3 years, $42 million
Naz.
There is little difference between the memory of a real event and the memory of a dream.
- Jimi_Thing
- Posts: 15798
- Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2017 6:53 pm
Re: Naz Reid Back - 3 years, $42 million
^^^^
Agreed - I'm hesitant to call the Gobert move a bust because when the Wolves win at least one Championship in the next couple of years, that argument disappears.
Aside from that huge move, Khanley should be applauded for the team friendly contracts he's been getting players to commit to.
Agreed - I'm hesitant to call the Gobert move a bust because when the Wolves win at least one Championship in the next couple of years, that argument disappears.
Aside from that huge move, Khanley should be applauded for the team friendly contracts he's been getting players to commit to.
-
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2017 8:26 pm
Re: Naz Reid Back - 3 years, $42 million
Question: where did the $ that we used for this contract come from? We're over the cap, we didn't have bird rights for NAZ, and we didn't use the mid-level exception, so how were we able to pull this off? Is there some other exception rule I'm missing?
-
- Posts: 1367
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2018 9:32 am
Re: Naz Reid Back - 3 years, $42 million
I thought we did have Bird rights on him.Silversword wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 3:28 pm Question: where did the $ that we used for this contract come from? We're over the cap, we didn't have bird rights for NAZ, and we didn't use the mid-level exception, so how were we able to pull this off? Is there some other exception rule I'm missing?
- Jimi_Thing
- Posts: 15798
- Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2017 6:53 pm
Re: Naz Reid Back - 3 years, $42 million
Same. Not sure why they wouldn't have Bird rights on him.aztimberwolves wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 3:48 pmI thought we did have Bird rights on him.Silversword wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 3:28 pm Question: where did the $ that we used for this contract come from? We're over the cap, we didn't have bird rights for NAZ, and we didn't use the mid-level exception, so how were we able to pull this off? Is there some other exception rule I'm missing?
- YBBR
- Posts: 30690
- Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2017 12:49 pm
Re: Naz Reid Back - 3 years, $42 million
They've had Naz for 4 seasons, so they did have his bird rights. 3 or less for the CBA I think they don't manifest. Which is probably why they signed him to a 4 year deal initially. It's a little weird for an undrafted free agent.
"Come up off your smooth talk player, this raspy. You stuck on Morse code player, this ASCII."
- YBBR
- Posts: 30690
- Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2017 12:49 pm
Re: Naz Reid Back - 3 years, $42 million
Less than 3 seasons I think I just read it was. So once you hit 3 seasons, they have his bird rights.
"Come up off your smooth talk player, this raspy. You stuck on Morse code player, this ASCII."
-
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2017 8:26 pm
Re: Naz Reid Back - 3 years, $42 million
Thanks. I thought undrafted players (and second round players) didn't earn bird rights, but I think you're right about 4-year players earning bird rights... hadn't thought of that.
- irishman89
- Posts: 5213
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2017 3:34 pm
Re: Naz Reid Back - 3 years, $42 million
I think Minnesota, as well as Chicago, would choose the Naz value. Vuc is no slouch, however. He's just on a poorly constructed roster, and always has been.Jimi_Thing wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 12:18 pm If given the choice between Naz & Vucevic who would my fellow Rubes go with?
If given the choice between Naz with a 3yr/42 million or Vucevic with a 3/year 60 million, who would my fellow Rubes go with?
- shuttlesworth
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2017 11:12 am
Re: Naz Reid Back - 3 years, $42 million
Interesting question. Vuc is a better player in a vacuum, but he's 32, on the decline, and makes $6 million more per year than Naz. And on the Wolves specifically, Naz is a better fit - he's light enough to play some 4, whereas Vuc is a true 5 who would probably be a more awkward fit with Towns and/or Gobert. So I think Naz is a pretty easy call here.Jimi_Thing wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 12:18 pm If given the choice between Naz & Vucevic who would my fellow Rubes go with?
If given the choice between Naz with a 3yr/42 million or Vucevic with a 3/year 60 million, who would my fellow Rubes go with?
- YBBR
- Posts: 30690
- Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2017 12:49 pm
Re: Naz Reid Back - 3 years, $42 million
Naz is also still on the upswing. He's added a few key pieces to his game since he was signed. He's got in much better shape to show off his athleticism and lateral quickness. His handle is straight up filthy now compared to where it was. Allowing him to get to wherever he wants to go. That's pretty rare for a 5 that can handle like him. His defense and rim protection have improved, too.shuttlesworth wrote: ↑Sat Jul 01, 2023 4:22 pmInteresting question. Vuc is a better player in a vacuum, but he's 32, on the decline, and makes $6 million more per year than Naz. And on the Wolves specifically, Naz is a better fit - he's light enough to play some 4, whereas Vuc is a true 5 who would probably be a more awkward fit with Towns and/or Gobert. So I think Naz is a pretty easy call here.Jimi_Thing wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 12:18 pm If given the choice between Naz & Vucevic who would my fellow Rubes go with?
If given the choice between Naz with a 3yr/42 million or Vucevic with a 3/year 60 million, who would my fellow Rubes go with?
I feel like his 3-point shooting has stagnated a bit. If he can improve his shot continually, he's a stud.
"Come up off your smooth talk player, this raspy. You stuck on Morse code player, this ASCII."