It's an excellent place for wolves content if you like that sort of thing.
All I'm saying is, this wasn't some historically bad trade that some are saying it is. There is a lot left to play out.
It's an excellent place for wolves content if you like that sort of thing.
Considering Gobert's age, contract, playoff failures and obvious questions around his fit alongside Towns, the number of assets and the financial flexibility they gave up to bring him in will always be considered bad.BBG wrote: ↑Fri Nov 03, 2023 9:45 amIt's an excellent place for wolves content if you like that sort of thing.
All I'm saying is, this wasn't some historically bad trade that some are saying it is. There is a lot left to play out.
Strapped us. We have no firsts to provide in a trade so we're stuck in terms of getting anything better than Gobert and we aren't getting any of the talent that Utah is taking from us every other year. For one guy. Just didn't seem like a smart move. Guess we'll see.SHAFA wrote: ↑Fri Nov 03, 2023 10:14 amConsidering Gobert's age, contract, playoff failures and obvious questions around his fit alongside Towns, the number of assets and the financial flexibility they gave up to bring him in will always be considered bad.
I'll agree, however, that it's still a bit of a sliding scale on exactly how bad it turns out to be.
It absolutely did. But if somehow they manage to reach even the WCF after that, then it's not *as* bad as if they're a play-in/first round exit team every year until his deal expires.Roy Kent wrote: ↑Fri Nov 03, 2023 10:19 amStrapped us. We have no firsts to provide in a trade so we're stuck in terms of getting anything better than Gobert and we aren't getting any of the talent that Utah is taking from us every other year. For one guy. Just didn't seem like a smart move. Guess we'll see.SHAFA wrote: ↑Fri Nov 03, 2023 10:14 amConsidering Gobert's age, contract, playoff failures and obvious questions around his fit alongside Towns, the number of assets and the financial flexibility they gave up to bring him in will always be considered bad.
I'll agree, however, that it's still a bit of a sliding scale on exactly how bad it turns out to be.
And that's the question. What result should we expect from a trade like this? Just making the playoffs vs winning it all. Anything in between? For me, I want to be in the finals. But I don't think they did it the right way to make this happen. Guess we'll see.SHAFA wrote: ↑Fri Nov 03, 2023 11:30 amIt absolutely did. But if somehow they manage to reach even the WCF after that, then it's not *as* bad as if they're a play-in/first round exit team every year until his deal expires.Roy Kent wrote: ↑Fri Nov 03, 2023 10:19 amStrapped us. We have no firsts to provide in a trade so we're stuck in terms of getting anything better than Gobert and we aren't getting any of the talent that Utah is taking from us every other year. For one guy. Just didn't seem like a smart move. Guess we'll see.SHAFA wrote: ↑Fri Nov 03, 2023 10:14 am
Considering Gobert's age, contract, playoff failures and obvious questions around his fit alongside Towns, the number of assets and the financial flexibility they gave up to bring him in will always be considered bad.
I'll agree, however, that it's still a bit of a sliding scale on exactly how bad it turns out to be.
That is incorrect. We can trade Naz, Anderson, Towns, McDaniels, Heck even Gobert for $.50 on the dollar. We have plenty of ways to improve the team. Improve is not exclusive to keeping everything we have, and only adding to it without subtraction of any top 7 players.Roy Kent wrote: ↑Fri Nov 03, 2023 10:19 amStrapped us. We have no firsts to provide in a trade so we're stuck in terms of getting anything better than Gobert and we aren't getting any of the talent that Utah is taking from us every other year. For one guy. Just didn't seem like a smart move. Guess we'll see.SHAFA wrote: ↑Fri Nov 03, 2023 10:14 amConsidering Gobert's age, contract, playoff failures and obvious questions around his fit alongside Towns, the number of assets and the financial flexibility they gave up to bring him in will always be considered bad.
I'll agree, however, that it's still a bit of a sliding scale on exactly how bad it turns out to be.
Boom!flexbuffchest wrote: ↑Sun Nov 05, 2023 12:34 pm I'm getting close to admitting defeat on this. Kessler may be already close to peaking which is kind of a shame when that happens to impact rookies. I still don't like the trade but if this version of Rudy keeps it up then who the hell cares about a first round pick in 2027?
I don't. I care about our 2029.flexbuffchest wrote: ↑Sun Nov 05, 2023 12:34 pm I'm getting close to admitting defeat on this. Kessler may be already close to peaking which is kind of a shame when that happens to impact rookies. I still don't like the trade but if this version of Rudy keeps it up then who the hell cares about a first round pick in 2027?
The number of valuable picks make it the worst trade in recent memory in any pro sport.BBG wrote: ↑Fri Nov 03, 2023 9:45 amIt's an excellent place for wolves content if you like that sort of thing.
All I'm saying is, this wasn't some historically bad trade that some are saying it is. There is a lot left to play out.
Has it occurred to you that you might be WAy overvaluing the picks. Assuming none of them will be top 10 it’s very hard to project value. You have to have the asset become realized before assessong value. You can buy all the lottery tickets you want and consider them valuable, but if none of them hit, how valuable are they????DonaldDouchebag wrote: ↑Sun Nov 05, 2023 10:19 pmThe number of valuable picks make it the worst trade in recent memory in any pro sport.
That’s ignoring the ability to improve the team via trade for the majority of the 7 years they extended all the picks out.aztimberwolves wrote: ↑Sun Nov 05, 2023 10:37 pmHas it occurred to you that you might be WAy overvaluing the picks. Assuming none of them will be top 10 it’s very hard to project value. You have to have the asset become realized before assessong value. You can buy all the lottery tickets you want and consider them valuable, but if none of them hit, how valuable are they????DonaldDouchebag wrote: ↑Sun Nov 05, 2023 10:19 pmThe number of valuable picks make it the worst trade in recent memory in any pro sport.
I'm in agreement with you regarding this not being nearly as terrible of a trade that some are making out to be. Here's what we're looking at in the upcoming years...BBG wrote: ↑Mon Nov 06, 2023 11:38 am Do we have room for these picks? We have Luka and Minott who can't even get on the floor, but we want more picks?
Do we really want the next Josh Okogie, Jarrett Culver, Kris Dunn or Keita Bates-Diop? I'm good on all that. We have the guys we need to grow and improve our team.
Who did the Jazz take with our pick? Was that George or Sensabough? Because those guys don't seem to be anything but a rotation player
I think he is worth 2 unprotected picks. Plus whatever player comes back to match salaries. The wolves would even balk at that type of offer.Jimi_Thing wrote: ↑Mon Nov 06, 2023 1:50 pmI'm in agreement with you regarding this not being nearly as terrible of a trade that some are making out to be. Here's what we're looking at in the upcoming years...BBG wrote: ↑Mon Nov 06, 2023 11:38 am Do we have room for these picks? We have Luka and Minott who can't even get on the floor, but we want more picks?
Do we really want the next Josh Okogie, Jarrett Culver, Kris Dunn or Keita Bates-Diop? I'm good on all that. We have the guys we need to grow and improve our team.
Who did the Jazz take with our pick? Was that George or Sensabough? Because those guys don't seem to be anything but a rotation player
2024 – One first-round pick (MIN), one second-round pick (least of WAS/MEM)
2025 – One second-round pick (UTA)
2026 – One first-round pick (least of MIN/UTA), One second-round pick (least of MIA/IND/SAS)
2027 – No draft picks
2028 – One first-round (MIN)
2029 – One second-round pick (MIN)
Combine that with the fact that the Wolves' core isn't aging talent that's going to be washed by 2029, but instead will be in their prime. Plus, there's already young players (Miller, Minnot, Garza, and Clark) in the pipeline that are going to be getting minutes in these upcoming years.
The Wolves are trying to make a serious run. I would have liked acquiring Gobert at more of a bargain but that didn't happen. I'm glad they made this trade happen without adding McDaniels to it. McDaniels is worth at least 2 late 1st round picks IMO. And I'm glad the Wolves aren't trying to make a run while having to depend on Kessler or some clown like Christian Wood at C. The West is too competitive to make a serious Championship run with a glaring weakness like that.
Yeah. He’d have to want out of MN for them to even consider that.Mnwild1128 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 08, 2023 4:56 pmI think he is worth 2 unprotected picks. Plus whatever player comes back to match salaries. The wolves would even balk at that type of offer.Jimi_Thing wrote: ↑Mon Nov 06, 2023 1:50 pmI'm in agreement with you regarding this not being nearly as terrible of a trade that some are making out to be. Here's what we're looking at in the upcoming years...BBG wrote: ↑Mon Nov 06, 2023 11:38 am Do we have room for these picks? We have Luka and Minott who can't even get on the floor, but we want more picks?
Do we really want the next Josh Okogie, Jarrett Culver, Kris Dunn or Keita Bates-Diop? I'm good on all that. We have the guys we need to grow and improve our team.
Who did the Jazz take with our pick? Was that George or Sensabough? Because those guys don't seem to be anything but a rotation player
2024 – One first-round pick (MIN), one second-round pick (least of WAS/MEM)
2025 – One second-round pick (UTA)
2026 – One first-round pick (least of MIN/UTA), One second-round pick (least of MIA/IND/SAS)
2027 – No draft picks
2028 – One first-round (MIN)
2029 – One second-round pick (MIN)
Combine that with the fact that the Wolves' core isn't aging talent that's going to be washed by 2029, but instead will be in their prime. Plus, there's already young players (Miller, Minnot, Garza, and Clark) in the pipeline that are going to be getting minutes in these upcoming years.
The Wolves are trying to make a serious run. I would have liked acquiring Gobert at more of a bargain but that didn't happen. I'm glad they made this trade happen without adding McDaniels to it. McDaniels is worth at least 2 late 1st round picks IMO. And I'm glad the Wolves aren't trying to make a run while having to depend on Kessler or some clown like Christian Wood at C. The West is too competitive to make a serious Championship run with a glaring weakness like that.
I just think about Shabazz Muhammad, Wes Johnson, Derrick Williams, Kris Dunn, Corey Brewer, Jarrett Culver, and other Wolves draft picks and then I suddenly like the Gobert trade.Mnwild1128 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 05, 2023 1:54 pmI don't. I care about our 2029.flexbuffchest wrote: ↑Sun Nov 05, 2023 12:34 pm I'm getting close to admitting defeat on this. Kessler may be already close to peaking which is kind of a shame when that happens to impact rookies. I still don't like the trade but if this version of Rudy keeps it up then who the hell cares about a first round pick in 2027?
I don't like being that impotent for that long. Now if my team was the Nuggets or Celtics i would not care. I still do not trust this team. Mainly due to Kats influence.witljon wrote: ↑Wed Nov 08, 2023 10:22 pmI just think about Shabazz Muhammad, Wes Johnson, Derrick Williams, Kris Dunn, Corey Brewer, Jarrett Culver, and other Wolves draft picks and then I suddenly like the Gobert trade.Mnwild1128 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 05, 2023 1:54 pmI don't. I care about our 2029.flexbuffchest wrote: ↑Sun Nov 05, 2023 12:34 pm I'm getting close to admitting defeat on this. Kessler may be already close to peaking which is kind of a shame when that happens to impact rookies. I still don't like the trade but if this version of Rudy keeps it up then who the hell cares about a first round pick in 2027?
McDaniels #28???witljon wrote: ↑Wed Nov 08, 2023 10:22 pmI just think about Shabazz Muhammad, Wes Johnson, Derrick Williams, Kris Dunn, Corey Brewer, Jarrett Culver, and other Wolves draft picks and then I suddenly like the Gobert trade.Mnwild1128 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 05, 2023 1:54 pmI don't. I care about our 2029.flexbuffchest wrote: ↑Sun Nov 05, 2023 12:34 pm I'm getting close to admitting defeat on this. Kessler may be already close to peaking which is kind of a shame when that happens to impact rookies. I still don't like the trade but if this version of Rudy keeps it up then who the hell cares about a first round pick in 2027?
I’m gonna trustMnwild1128 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 08, 2023 10:27 pmI don't like being that impotent for that long. Now if my team was the Nuggets or Celtics i would not care. I still do not trust this team. Mainly due to Kats influence.
Wasn’t Gobert drafted around that spot?Mnwild1128 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 08, 2023 10:27 pmMcDaniels #28???
it was an awful trade.BBG wrote: ↑Fri Nov 03, 2023 9:45 amIt's an excellent place for wolves content if you like that sort of thing.
All I'm saying is, this wasn't some historically bad trade that some are saying it is. There is a lot left to play out.
What they gave up was a haul for someone to take you to the finals. He can play well all this year, if they lose in round 1 again or even round 2, it’s bad.bubu dubu. wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 9:56 amit was an awful trade.
It was an awful trade. If you win a championship over the next few years with Rudy here, it would be worth every first round pick for the next 20 years to bring home the first championship of any kind since 1991 here.bubu dubu. wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 9:56 amit was an awful trade.
All of the Hawks, Raps and Mavs had interest.T_J wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 10:26 amWhat they gave up was a haul for someone to take you to the finals. He can play well all this year, if they lose in round 1 again or even round 2, it’s bad.
I suppose a WCF run and a couple playoff outs soften the blow to what you gave up, but it was just an unsightly overpay. I don’t think they were bidding against anyone.