Note to guests/lurkers of this site. To continue reading content on some of our boards you will need to create an account.
Registration is free and easy, just remember your password and check back after your account has been approved by an administrator.
Please use the "contact us" link at the bottom of the page if you have any issues.
Registration is free and easy, just remember your password and check back after your account has been approved by an administrator.
Please use the "contact us" link at the bottom of the page if you have any issues.
This team would be better off with Case Keenum
-
- Posts: 3195
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 1:06 am
Re: This team would be better off with Case Keenum
I guess we're going to find out how much better off we are without Case.
- weimy froob
- Posts: 90371
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 11:10 am
Re: This team would be better off with Case Keenum
a great offensive line can make a ton of QB's look real good. pro bowl good. a bad offensive line can take down most any QB.hategreenticemase wrote: ↑Tue Sep 24, 2019 9:38 pmSpot fn on post (except saying OL is only reason Brady is so accomplished - that's fucking preposterous). Another way to look at this - Case masked poor OL play whereas Cousins exposes it. It's really that simple.minnemike wrote: ↑Tue Sep 24, 2019 6:35 pm I think Case has a higher floor when protection is bad, but no where near the ceiling of Cousins when protection is good. That's why they made the move. Case was never going to win it all vs great competition. Neither is Cousin's if you don't give him cleaner pockets. So the real crime as always is why they never developed the OLine as much as needed.
Take a look at a team like the Patriots. They ALWAYS have had a top oline protecting Brady. I would argue that's the only reason he's so accomplished. Look at Indy with Luck as the example of perfect QB talent wasted due to horrid oline.
As you perfectly stated, the real crime was why we never fixed the OL in first place, and other real crime - that RS still has a job.
- minnemike
- KFAN Rube Chat Hall of Fame Member
- Posts: 11920
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 8:10 pm
Re: This team would be better off with Case Keenum
Brady is an epic passer and elite. But he's a statue that would never survive behind even an average Oline. It had to be great for him to succeed.hategreenticemase wrote: ↑Tue Sep 24, 2019 9:38 pmSpot fn on post (except saying OL is only reason Brady is so accomplished - that's fucking preposterous). Another way to look at this - Case masked poor OL play whereas Cousins exposes it. It's really that simple.minnemike wrote: ↑Tue Sep 24, 2019 6:35 pm I think Case has a higher floor when protection is bad, but no where near the ceiling of Cousins when protection is good. That's why they made the move. Case was never going to win it all vs great competition. Neither is Cousin's if you don't give him cleaner pockets. So the real crime as always is why they never developed the OLine as much as needed.
Take a look at a team like the Patriots. They ALWAYS have had a top oline protecting Brady. I would argue that's the only reason he's so accomplished. Look at Indy with Luck as the example of perfect QB talent wasted due to horrid oline.
As you perfectly stated, the real crime was why we never fixed the OL in first place, and other real crime - that RS still has a job.
Vikes blew it big time thinking they could just invest all that money in Cousins and just have the same Oline. It was set to fail. Maybe they thought they were on their way before Sparano died and maybe the OLine progression died with him. We'll really never know, but the bottomline is that the OLine is not good enough to unlock Cousins as a decent passer.
-
- Posts: 2593
- Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2017 7:52 pm
Re: This team would be better off with Case Keenum
The same people who say next year we will be a shell of a team.B-Town wrote: ↑Wed Sep 25, 2019 8:32 amPurpleHaze wrote: ↑Tue Sep 24, 2019 5:43 pmEverybody said we would be a shell of a team this year because of the cap situation.......
Well........
Who said that? We retained everyone.
Simpson Get Lifted wrote
Should have been WAY more booing from the home crowd imo. You have to drown out the cheers from Oscar.
Oscar on the Vikes:
"I am all in for a 4th place finish."
Should have been WAY more booing from the home crowd imo. You have to drown out the cheers from Oscar.
Oscar on the Vikes:
"I am all in for a 4th place finish."
-
- Formerly Clarkgriswald
- Posts: 3236
- Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2017 8:28 am
Re: This team would be better off with Case Keenum
Hard to be a shell of 8-7-1
40+ year Viking fan turned Packer fan turned J-E-T-S fan.
-
- Posts: 2593
- Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2017 7:52 pm
Re: This team would be better off with Case Keenum
Jpm, you're the joke that keeps on giving!!!
Simpson Get Lifted wrote
Should have been WAY more booing from the home crowd imo. You have to drown out the cheers from Oscar.
Oscar on the Vikes:
"I am all in for a 4th place finish."
Should have been WAY more booing from the home crowd imo. You have to drown out the cheers from Oscar.
Oscar on the Vikes:
"I am all in for a 4th place finish."
- Night Train
- ***Official Gibby Award Winner - October 2018***
- Posts: 32324
- Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2017 10:56 pm
- Location: Corner of 14th and Oak
Re: This team would be better off with Case Keenum
Oof, watched the Bears/Skins highlights and Keenum really coughed the ball up a lot in that game, gave Chicago a short field a few times too and before they knew it Wash was down 3 TDs. His first INT went right through his receiver's hands though, but everything after that was kind of on him.
I don't think we'd be better off but think we'd probably be about the same.
I don't think we'd be better off but think we'd probably be about the same.
I apologize in advance if what I just said offended or upset you.
The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
Minnesota - Mired in Mediocrity
The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
Minnesota - Mired in Mediocrity
- B-Town
- Posts: 2512
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2017 8:14 am
Re: This team would be better off with Case Keenum
What does that even mean? The reality is that the Vikings had a good amount of cap room going into the 2019 season. Next year is much different. That's not really debatable; it's just numbers.PurpleHaze wrote: ↑Wed Sep 25, 2019 5:55 pmThe same people who say next year we will be a shell of a team.B-Town wrote: ↑Wed Sep 25, 2019 8:32 amPurpleHaze wrote: ↑Tue Sep 24, 2019 5:43 pm
Everybody said we would be a shell of a team this year because of the cap situation.......
Well........
Who said that? We retained everyone.
Dayman, Fighter of the Nightman.
Stup up, Abe!
Stup up, Abe!
- Beef Supreme
- Posts: 71374
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2017 11:49 pm
- Location: House of Representin'
Re: This team would be better off with Case Keenum
Elite QBs can absolutely mask bad OL. They make good pre-snap reads, slide protections to compensate, recognize pressure, and get rid of the call quickly.
Brady has had some years where his OL isn’t all that great and he’s managed beautifully.
Brady has had some years where his OL isn’t all that great and he’s managed beautifully.
“When stupidity is considered patriotism, it is unsafe to be intelligent.”
- Isaac Asimov
- Isaac Asimov
- minnemike
- KFAN Rube Chat Hall of Fame Member
- Posts: 11920
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 8:10 pm
Re: This team would be better off with Case Keenum
Which years are you considering? I don't think I've ever seen him without an at least above average line.Beef Supreme wrote: ↑Thu Sep 26, 2019 8:02 am Elite QBs can absolutely mask bad OL. They make good pre-snap reads, slide protections to compensate, recognize pressure, and get rid of the call quickly.
Brady has had some years where his OL isn’t all that great and he’s managed beautifully.
- Why Not Us
- Posts: 21984
- Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2018 1:16 pm
Re: This team would be better off with Case Keenum
Trade for Keenum!D_H wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 7:06 pm No he doesn't have the arm, doesn't have the physical stature , doesn't have the look, but what's between his chest is more important and I guarantee you he was more respected by his teammates than Kirk Cousins is. The money we're paying him should have been spent on the O-line, Case Keenum was just fine in this system. I have a feeling Mike Zimmer didn't want him, it was a GM move.
When he gets off the bus this week, don't let him leave MN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"You're not going to get Covid if you have these vaccinations." - Joe Biden, July 2021
- Slap Shot
- Posts: 40462
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 12:17 pm
- Location: Here there and everywhere
Re: This team would be better off with Case Keenum
Go on.D_H wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 7:06 pm No he doesn't have the arm, doesn't have the physical stature , doesn't have the look, but what's between his chest is more important and I guarantee you he was more respected by his teammates than Kirk Cousins is. The money we're paying him should have been spent on the O-line, Case Keenum was just fine in this system. I have a feeling Mike Zimmer didn't want him, it was a GM move.
- Hole Nova Level
- Posts: 5384
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 11:50 am
Re: This team would be better off with Case Keenum
So close....
-
- Posts: 3195
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 1:06 am
Re: This team would be better off with Case Keenum
Case brought this team to the NFC championship game, with a McKinnon/Murray tandem and without an Irv Smith whom really adds a nice wrinkle...in his one and only year. Let's measure against that, instead of a higher paid QB with a better Oline, a better tight end corp, and a better RB duo...putting up gawdy numbers against some bad teams.
- Philo Beddoe
- Posts: 7080
- Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2017 10:11 pm
- Contact:
Re: This team would be better off with Case Keenum
I think Kirk Cousins read this thread. They said he is playing angry.
High five everyone, we did it!
High five everyone, we did it!
Reigning Rube Chat Bracket Champion
-
- Posts: 194
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 10:46 pm
Re: This team would be better off with Case Keenum
You joke but I would do this. If Kirk gets knocked into oblivion on a blown blocking assignment we need a good battle tested backup. It’s how Keenum became dear to our hearts in the first placeWhy Not Us wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2019 7:23 pmTrade for Keenum!D_H wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 7:06 pm No he doesn't have the arm, doesn't have the physical stature , doesn't have the look, but what's between his chest is more important and I guarantee you he was more respected by his teammates than Kirk Cousins is. The money we're paying him should have been spent on the O-line, Case Keenum was just fine in this system. I have a feeling Mike Zimmer didn't want him, it was a GM move.
When he gets off the bus this week, don't let him leave MN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!