Re: Conley-Rubio-Teague
Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2019 6:53 am
It will never happen, but Malcolm Brogdon is the perfect PG for this team.
A site to discuss Minnesota sports, news, culture, and more
https://forum.mnrubecentral.com/
If I'm Memphis, I'd rather have the pick and nothing else to take back.UnFadeable21 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2019 5:09 pm Utah writer said Conley is still the Jazz’s top priority but they don’t have the contracts to match for a trade.
Time for my scenario to start the wheels churning.
Jazz 1st, Teague Grizz
S&T Rubio to MN
Conley to Utah
Does it matter if it's only a single year that you could maybe use at trade deadline?HeHateMe wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2019 4:02 pmIf I'm Memphis, I'd rather have the pick and nothing else to take back.UnFadeable21 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2019 5:09 pm Utah writer said Conley is still the Jazz’s top priority but they don’t have the contracts to match for a trade.
Time for my scenario to start the wheels churning.
Jazz 1st, Teague Grizz
S&T Rubio to MN
Conley to Utah
Expiring contracts are valuable in some aspects but to a shitty team that probably wants to clear money off their books? Doubt that helps them. There's a reason I'd circle Toronto and Charlotte for Wiggins potential deals -- they have big contracts on their books they might look to move to get something else when they're already over the cap and are stuck without cap flexibility. In Toronto's case Kawhi would have to leave.Moses Scurry wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2019 4:03 pmDoes it matter if it's only a single year that you could maybe use at trade deadline?HeHateMe wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2019 4:02 pmIf I'm Memphis, I'd rather have the pick and nothing else to take back.UnFadeable21 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2019 5:09 pm Utah writer said Conley is still the Jazz’s top priority but they don’t have the contracts to match for a trade.
Time for my scenario to start the wheels churning.
Jazz 1st, Teague Grizz
S&T Rubio to MN
Conley to Utah
If they get Teague’s expiring, added with their two own in Parson’s and Jonas, they would have 60+ million free next seasonHeHateMe wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2019 4:02 pmIf I'm Memphis, I'd rather have the pick and nothing else to take back.UnFadeable21 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2019 5:09 pm Utah writer said Conley is still the Jazz’s top priority but they don’t have the contracts to match for a trade.
Time for my scenario to start the wheels churning.
Jazz 1st, Teague Grizz
S&T Rubio to MN
Conley to Utah
This. Why would Utah just not trade send their first for Conley. Teague adds negative value lol.HeHateMe wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2019 4:02 pmIf I'm Memphis, I'd rather have the pick and nothing else to take back.UnFadeable21 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2019 5:09 pm Utah writer said Conley is still the Jazz’s top priority but they don’t have the contracts to match for a trade.
Time for my scenario to start the wheels churning.
Jazz 1st, Teague Grizz
S&T Rubio to MN
Conley to Utah
They don't have the cap space to absorb Conley straight up.Sergeant Rubetube wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2019 5:18 pmThis. Why would Utah just not trade send their first for Conley. Teague adds negative value lol.HeHateMe wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2019 4:02 pmIf I'm Memphis, I'd rather have the pick and nothing else to take back.UnFadeable21 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2019 5:09 pm Utah writer said Conley is still the Jazz’s top priority but they don’t have the contracts to match for a trade.
Time for my scenario to start the wheels churning.
Jazz 1st, Teague Grizz
S&T Rubio to MN
Conley to Utah
Thank god we won't be going down this road anyway.
I thought they can get to like 35ish mil in cap space.UnFadeable21 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2019 9:27 pmThey don't have the cap space to absorb Conley straight up.Sergeant Rubetube wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2019 5:18 pmThis. Why would Utah just not trade send their first for Conley. Teague adds negative value lol.
Thank god we won't be going down this road anyway.
They would have to release Korver and Favors to be at that 30 million rangeHeHateMe wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 9:41 amI thought they can get to like 35ish mil in cap space.UnFadeable21 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2019 9:27 pmThey don't have the cap space to absorb Conley straight up.Sergeant Rubetube wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2019 5:18 pm
This. Why would Utah just not trade send their first for Conley. Teague adds negative value lol.
Thank god we won't be going down this road anyway.
They're at like 92 with Favors and a bunch of the other non guaranteed deals.
Easy $$$.UnFadeable21 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 10:05 amThey would have to release Korver and Favors to be at that 30 million rangeHeHateMe wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 9:41 amI thought they can get to like 35ish mil in cap space.UnFadeable21 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2019 9:27 pm
They don't have the cap space to absorb Conley straight up.
They're at like 92 with Favors and a bunch of the other non guaranteed deals.
By then what assets do you have to trade for Conley. A mid 20’s pick won’t do it.HeHateMe wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 10:20 amEasy $$$.UnFadeable21 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 10:05 amThey would have to release Korver and Favors to be at that 30 million range
A protected first + Exum for Conley. Memphis' goal is to clear $$$$.UnFadeable21 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 10:22 amBy then what assets do you have to trade for Conley. A mid 20’s pick won’t do it.HeHateMe wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 10:20 amEasy $$$.UnFadeable21 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 10:05 am
They would have to release Korver and Favors to be at that 30 million range
Don’t think you need to protect a first when it’s in the mid 20’s already bro lol
Meant it as a future pick so they can keep this year's if they want... and Memphis would prefer to roll the dice on a future pick being better of course.UnFadeable21 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 12:25 pmDon’t think you need to protect a first when it’s in the mid 20’s already bro lolHeHateMe wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 10:42 amA protected first + Exum for Conley. Memphis' goal is to clear $$$$.UnFadeable21 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 10:22 am
By then what assets do you have to trade for Conley. A mid 20’s pick won’t do it.
Don’t know how Utah gets worse with Conley.HeHateMe wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 12:30 pmMeant it as a future pick so they can keep this year's if they want... and Memphis would prefer to roll the dice on a future pick being better of course.UnFadeable21 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 12:25 pmDon’t think you need to protect a first when it’s in the mid 20’s already bro lol
Good to know the $30m a year player who the fate of the franchise should be resting upon for the next half decade needs his hand held by brick laying, one dimensional point guard.whiskerbiscuit wrote: ↑Thu Jun 06, 2019 3:01 pm Remember when Wiggins wasn't god awful, and actually looked like an extremely promising prospect, so much so that he got a max deal?
That was because of one Ricky Rubio. Say what you want about him, but that's a fact.
Wiggins is a turd, but it's indisputable that he was exponentially better when Rubio was setting him up.T_J wrote: ↑Thu Jun 06, 2019 3:06 pmGood to know the $30m a year player who the fate of the franchise should be resting upon for the next half decade needs his hand held by brick laying, one dimensional point guard.whiskerbiscuit wrote: ↑Thu Jun 06, 2019 3:01 pm Remember when Wiggins wasn't god awful, and actually looked like an extremely promising prospect, so much so that he got a max deal?
That was because of one Ricky Rubio. Say what you want about him, but that's a fact.
If it made him and us better why do you care? If you don't like broccoli and it makes him better do you care if he eats it?T_J wrote: ↑Thu Jun 06, 2019 3:06 pmGood to know the $30m a year player who the fate of the franchise should be resting upon for the next half decade needs his hand held by brick laying, one dimensional point guard.whiskerbiscuit wrote: ↑Thu Jun 06, 2019 3:01 pm Remember when Wiggins wasn't god awful, and actually looked like an extremely promising prospect, so much so that he got a max deal?
That was because of one Ricky Rubio. Say what you want about him, but that's a fact.
Thibbs was like a totally irrational fanboy when it came to Butler. He put on the blinders when he got here and used almost every asset the Wolves had in his attempts to get Butler from the moment he got here. Thibbs didn’t stop to consider the reality that Butler really never wanted to come here. Just because Butler liked Thibbs didn’t mean he was going to like Minnesota.whiskerbiscuit wrote: ↑Thu Jun 06, 2019 5:31 pm I'd take Ricky back in a heartbeat over what we have now. Just surround him with shooters. You can win a title with him and a solid backup that can shoot.
Never should have gotten rid of him to begin with, especially for Turd Teague and 5 extra mil. Certainly should have drafted Turd Dunn to replace him.
Biscuit's plan of
Ricky
Murray or Hield
Wiggins
Markaanen
Towns
And whatever we could get for Lavine would look damn nice right now.
Fuck Thibs.
That team is so bad on D I think it gave me cancer.whiskerbiscuit wrote: ↑Thu Jun 06, 2019 5:31 pm I'd take Ricky back in a heartbeat over what we have now. Just surround him with shooters. You can win a title with him and a solid backup that can shoot.
Never should have gotten rid of him to begin with, especially for Turd Teague and 5 extra mil. Certainly should have drafted Turd Dunn to replace him.
Biscuit's plan of
Ricky
Murray or Hield
Wiggins
Markaanen
Towns
And whatever we could get for Lavine would look damn nice right now.
Fuck Thibs.
For sure.Thrillkill wrote: ↑Thu Jun 06, 2019 6:12 pmThat team is so bad on D I think it gave me cancer.whiskerbiscuit wrote: ↑Thu Jun 06, 2019 5:31 pm I'd take Ricky back in a heartbeat over what we have now. Just surround him with shooters. You can win a title with him and a solid backup that can shoot.
Never should have gotten rid of him to begin with, especially for Turd Teague and 5 extra mil. Certainly should have drafted Turd Dunn to replace him.
Biscuit's plan of
Ricky
Murray or Hield
Wiggins
Markaanen
Towns
And whatever we could get for Lavine would look damn nice right now.
Fuck Thibs.