Post a picture of your ride

[Mandatory]

Wish I had a late 90's Thunderbird. V8

[The Lizard King]

Wish I had a late 90's Thunderbird. V8

If I was to go with the T-Bird as a daily driver, I'd go with a 2002-2005 one.



Actually, skip the 2002 one. It had a lower-hp engine than the 2003-2005 ones. All were V8, rear-wheel-drive convertibles.

[Cobey]

Wish I had a late 90's Thunderbird. V8

If I was to go with the T-Bird as a daily driver, I'd go with a 2002-2005 one.



Actually, skip the 2002 one. It had a lower-hp engine than the 2003-2005 ones. All were V8, rear-wheel-drive convertibles.

That engine was dog shit though. At least in terms of reliability.

I had the Lincoln LS, which is the same 3.9L V8. That thing ate through ignition coils like you wouldn't believe and had a ton of electrical demons too.

[The Lizard King]

Wish I had a late 90's Thunderbird. V8

If I was to go with the T-Bird as a daily driver, I'd go with a 2002-2005 one.



Actually, skip the 2002 one. It had a lower-hp engine than the 2003-2005 ones. All were V8, rear-wheel-drive convertibles.

That engine was dog shit though. At least in terms of reliability.

I had the Lincoln LS, which is the same 3.9L V8. That thing ate through ignition coils like you wouldn't believe and had a ton of electrical demons too.

Good to know. I'm always perusing CL for convertibles, and I'll cross this one off my list.

What do you think of the Chrysler Crossfire convertible, especially one with a manual transmission?

[Cobey]

If I was to go with the T-Bird as a daily driver, I'd go with a 2002-2005 one.



Actually, skip the 2002 one. It had a lower-hp engine than the 2003-2005 ones. All were V8, rear-wheel-drive convertibles.

That engine was dog shit though. At least in terms of reliability.

I had the Lincoln LS, which is the same 3.9L V8. That thing ate through ignition coils like you wouldn't believe and had a ton of electrical demons too.

Good to know. I'm always perusing CL for convertibles, and I'll cross this one off my list.

What do you think of the Chrysler Crossfire convertible, especially one with a manual transmission?

I have no personal experience with Mopar products, so I can't speak to this on the same level. Aesthetically, I do dig that more than I used to though. I recall thinking it was hateful looking when it came out, but it has grown on me.


As far as American convertibles go from around that era, I am a fan of the Saturn Sky. But they are kind of tough to find.

[The Lizard King]

That engine was dog shit though. At least in terms of reliability.

I had the Lincoln LS, which is the same 3.9L V8. That thing ate through ignition coils like you wouldn't believe and had a ton of electrical demons too.

Good to know. I'm always perusing CL for convertibles, and I'll cross this one off my list.

What do you think of the Chrysler Crossfire convertible, especially one with a manual transmission?

I have no personal experience with Mopar products, so I can't speak to this on the same level. Aesthetically, I do dig that more than I used to though. I recall thinking it was hateful looking when it came out, but it has grown on me.


As far as American convertibles go from around that era, I am a fan of the Saturn Sky. But they are kind of tough to find.

I like the front end better on the Pontiac Solstice.

[Cobey]

Good to know. I'm always perusing CL for convertibles, and I'll cross this one off my list.

What do you think of the Chrysler Crossfire convertible, especially one with a manual transmission?

I have no personal experience with Mopar products, so I can't speak to this on the same level. Aesthetically, I do dig that more than I used to though. I recall thinking it was hateful looking when it came out, but it has grown on me.


As far as American convertibles go from around that era, I am a fan of the Saturn Sky. But they are kind of tough to find.

I like the front end better on the Pontiac Solstice.

They're the same chassis, just with different badges and body, right? That is another car that has grown on me over time too.

[The Lizard King]

I have no personal experience with Mopar products, so I can't speak to this on the same level. Aesthetically, I do dig that more than I used to though. I recall thinking it was hateful looking when it came out, but it has grown on me.


As far as American convertibles go from around that era, I am a fan of the Saturn Sky. But they are kind of tough to find.

I like the front end better on the Pontiac Solstice.

They're the same chassis, just with different badges and body, right? That is another car that has grown on me over time too.

Yes. I just like the body for the Solstice better.

[weimy froob]

saw something like this today with collector plates. it wasn't mint-but it was nice. probably a 1968 or 1969. the pic is of one from 1968.

[The Lizard King]

saw something like this today with collector plates. it wasn't mint-but it was nice. probably a 1968 or 1969. the pic is of one from 1968.

I'm partial to the 1966 Pontiac Catalina.

[Mandatory]

[The Lizard King]

Are Range Rover/Land Rover's reliable? I don't have one because I don't trust them much.

[Mandatory]

Are Range Rover/Land Rover's reliable? I don't have one because I don't trust them much.

I had a 1993 Discovery circa mid 2000s. It was very unreliable. Spent about half the time I had it in the shop.