Re: Nino's gone
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2019 7:03 pm
Nino with another goal for Carolina tonight. I wonder how many games it will take Rask to get five goals?
A site to discuss Minnesota sports, news, culture, and more
https://forum.mnrubecentral.com/
Nino was not scoring here. Whatever he does in Carolina is irrelevant. Let it go.Ron Burgundy 4 President wrote: ↑Fri Feb 01, 2019 7:03 pm Nino with another goal for Carolina tonight. I wonder how many games it will take Rask to get five goals?
I won't dispute the fact that Nino is a watered down version of his old self for whatever reason, but he was still on pace for 17-18 goals playing mostly 4th line minutes even before the trade. Rask can't duplicate even those modest numbers and he's slower than Nino on a team that already has speed issues. I'll say it again, I don't have a problem trading him but he's at worst an average yet legitimate NHL player while Rask is about 1.5 years away from taking his career to the KHL. It's an honest disagreement we are having and I get what you are saying, but for whatever it's worth I must not be completely insane because I think Russo would side with me given this.....Lenny5160 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 04, 2019 1:51 pmNino was not scoring here. Whatever he does in Carolina is irrelevant. Let it go.Ron Burgundy 4 President wrote: ↑Fri Feb 01, 2019 7:03 pm Nino with another goal for Carolina tonight. I wonder how many games it will take Rask to get five goals?
I don't have a huge problem with thinking that Rask sucks, although personally I'm giving it more time to play out. It's the constant comparisons to Nino's sudden rejuvenation that drives me crazy, and you are far from alone in doing that. Nino had more than enough time to show that in green.Ron Burgundy 4 President wrote: ↑Mon Feb 04, 2019 10:45 pmI won't dispute the fact that Nino is a watered down version of his old self for whatever reason, but he was still on pace for 17-18 goals playing mostly 4th line minutes even before the trade. Rask can't duplicate even those modest numbers and he's slower than Nino on a team that already has speed issues. I'll say it again, I don't have a problem trading him but he's at worst an average yet legitimate NHL player while Rask is about 1.5 years away from taking his career to the KHL. It's an honest disagreement we are having and I get what you are saying, but for whatever it's worth I must not be completely insane because I think Russo would side with me given this.....Lenny5160 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 04, 2019 1:51 pmNino was not scoring here. Whatever he does in Carolina is irrelevant. Let it go.Ron Burgundy 4 President wrote: ↑Fri Feb 01, 2019 7:03 pm Nino with another goal for Carolina tonight. I wonder how many games it will take Rask to get five goals?
I can't speak for everyone who thinks we got the worse end of this trade, but as for myself this isn't some hindsight 20/20 option a few weeks after the trade. It was a bad trade and I said as much the day that it happened. I think you'll find I've been pretty consistent with that opinion if you check my earlier posts.Lenny5160 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 04, 2019 11:20 pmI don't have a huge problem with thinking that Rask sucks, although personally I'm giving it more time to play out. It's the constant comparisons to Nino's sudden rejuvenation that drives me crazy, and you are far from alone in doing that. Nino had more than enough time to show that in green.Ron Burgundy 4 President wrote: ↑Mon Feb 04, 2019 10:45 pmI won't dispute the fact that Nino is a watered down version of his old self for whatever reason, but he was still on pace for 17-18 goals playing mostly 4th line minutes even before the trade. Rask can't duplicate even those modest numbers and he's slower than Nino on a team that already has speed issues. I'll say it again, I don't have a problem trading him but he's at worst an average yet legitimate NHL player while Rask is about 1.5 years away from taking his career to the KHL. It's an honest disagreement we are having and I get what you are saying, but for whatever it's worth I must not be completely insane because I think Russo would side with me given this.....
The entire fan base and two different GMs wanted to move Nino and Coyle. There was no market at all, but Fenton finally took what was being offered for the sake of making some sort of change on the big club.
Nino gets a new lease on life and starts finding the net (with no assists) and suddenly this trade has turned into a complete disaster. I just don't see it. There's no doubt we got a worse player back, but saved some money and filled a weaker position on the roster. Lost a bottom 6 guy and got a bottom 6 guy. Don't love Rask on the PP. Whatever.
If you want to tell me that Nino is streaky and was more bad than good the last two seasons I won’t argue with you.
Yup. Fenton inherited a terrible situation.Hornets wrote: ↑Fri Feb 22, 2019 4:00 pm Not going to 2nd guess Fenton on the moves he's made and the one's he will make soon or after the season. The players themselves put Fenton in the position he is in by underachieving and the team was heading nowhere. Let's be fair here and give the trades a couple years to play out and THEN decide if they were good or bad.
You're on FIRE tonight!Hole Nova Level wrote: ↑Fri Feb 22, 2019 8:34 pmYup. Fenton inherited a terrible situation.Hornets wrote: ↑Fri Feb 22, 2019 4:00 pm Not going to 2nd guess Fenton on the moves he's made and the one's he will make soon or after the season. The players themselves put Fenton in the position he is in by underachieving and the team was heading nowhere. Let's be fair here and give the trades a couple years to play out and THEN decide if they were good or bad.
A hockey roster full of near-female (many of the players are possibly in transition) players, that have ZERO drive to win anything more than a regular season game, is hard to trade and get much in return for.
The rest of the league's GM's know that the Wild have bit-players, that can help their bottom two lines and 4-6 D-men and that's not going to fetch you much.
Most Wild fan's tho think all Wild Players should fetch a 1st round pick and/or perennial all star in return for trade.
Fenton could trade every single one of these passive aggressive hockey players for nothing but picks and minor league players and I'd be as happy as f-ckin Jason (Carly) Zucker at a baby shower! (Jason is the kind of guy that loves baby showers, for sure)
Go look at my Zucker bets in the Zucker thread. Le'ts gooooooo!Hornets wrote: ↑Fri Feb 22, 2019 8:38 pmYou're on FIRE tonight!Hole Nova Level wrote: ↑Fri Feb 22, 2019 8:34 pmYup. Fenton inherited a terrible situation.Hornets wrote: ↑Fri Feb 22, 2019 4:00 pm Not going to 2nd guess Fenton on the moves he's made and the one's he will make soon or after the season. The players themselves put Fenton in the position he is in by underachieving and the team was heading nowhere. Let's be fair here and give the trades a couple years to play out and THEN decide if they were good or bad.
A hockey roster full of near-female (many of the players are possibly in transition) players, that have ZERO drive to win anything more than a regular season game, is hard to trade and get much in return for.
The rest of the league's GM's know that the Wild have bit-players, that can help their bottom two lines and 4-6 D-men and that's not going to fetch you much.
Most Wild fan's tho think all Wild Players should fetch a 1st round pick and/or perennial all star in return for trade.
Fenton could trade every single one of these passive aggressive hockey players for nothing but picks and minor league players and I'd be as happy as f-ckin Jason (Carly) Zucker at a baby shower! (Jason is the kind of guy that loves baby showers, for sure)
Don't know which Wild fans you talk to, but most of the ones that I talk to, including the ones here aren't under any illusions regarding their perceived value of players on this roster. Sure, I hated the Nino trade and won't shutup about it, but that has more to do with the fact that Rask is an absolute dogshit player (I wouldn't be surprised if he's a buyout candidate already) and I said as much the day the trade happened. The fact that Nino is putting an exclamation point on how awful it was shouldn't go unnoticed or ignored.Hole Nova Level wrote: ↑Fri Feb 22, 2019 8:34 pmYup. Fenton inherited a terrible situation.Hornets wrote: ↑Fri Feb 22, 2019 4:00 pm Not going to 2nd guess Fenton on the moves he's made and the one's he will make soon or after the season. The players themselves put Fenton in the position he is in by underachieving and the team was heading nowhere. Let's be fair here and give the trades a couple years to play out and THEN decide if they were good or bad.
A hockey roster full of near-female (many of the players are possibly in transition) players, that have ZERO drive to win anything more than a regular season game, is hard to trade and get much in return for.
The rest of the league's GM's know that the Wild have bit-players, that can help their bottom two lines and 4-6 D-men and that's not going to fetch you much.
Most Wild fan's tho think all Wild Players should fetch a 1st round pick and/or perennial all star in return for trade.
Fenton could trade every single one of these passive aggressive hockey players for nothing but picks and minor league players and I'd be as happy as f-ckin Jason (Carly) Zucker at a baby shower! (Jason is the kind of guy that loves baby showers, for sure)
Yikes....I had forgotten the Hanzal disaster. Has to be top 5 of Wild's all time worst trades.bubu dubu. wrote: ↑Fri Feb 22, 2019 11:00 pm I'll go on record and say I was disappointed that the draft pick Coyle got back was just a 5th rounder, but I might be underselling the Donato kid. I was not however, under the delusion that a first rounder could have been had in place of the 5th rounder. Was thinking more like a 3rd rounder.
Also, NHL trades are hard to figure out for me. Maybe its just the past of Fletcher leading me to think that way, but he did things like give up a first round pick for Martin "Fucking" Hanzal as well as a 4th rounder. And then of course trading a first, a 2nd, and two highly rated prospects (who havent turned out great) in Larsson and Hackett.
I agree bubu!!
Top 3 at least in my book. Man he suckedHornets wrote: ↑Sat Feb 23, 2019 11:05 amYikes....I had forgotten the Hanzal disaster. Has to be top 5 of Wild's all time worst trades.bubu dubu. wrote: ↑Fri Feb 22, 2019 11:00 pm I'll go on record and say I was disappointed that the draft pick Coyle got back was just a 5th rounder, but I might be underselling the Donato kid. I was not however, under the delusion that a first rounder could have been had in place of the 5th rounder. Was thinking more like a 3rd rounder.
Also, NHL trades are hard to figure out for me. Maybe its just the past of Fletcher leading me to think that way, but he did things like give up a first round pick for Martin "Fucking" Hanzal as well as a 4th rounder. And then of course trading a first, a 2nd, and two highly rated prospects (who havent turned out great) in Larsson and Hackett.