Note to guests/lurkers of this site. To continue reading content on some of our boards you will need to create an account.

Registration is free and easy, just remember your password and check back after your account has been approved by an administrator.

Please use the "contact us" link at the bottom of the page if you have any issues.

Timberwolves over/under at 27.5 wins

A place to discuss the MN Timberwolves
User avatar
Philo Beddoe
Posts: 7080
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2017 10:11 pm
Contact:

Timberwolves over/under at 27.5 wins

Post by Philo Beddoe »

So 28-44 wins you money.

Wolves will win 35 games this year. Lock.

I need to open up a new betting account.
Reigning Rube Chat Bracket Champion
User avatar
j2j
Posts: 27781
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2017 10:43 pm

Re: Timberwolves over/under at 27.5 wins

Post by j2j »

I put them at 30, but not a comfortable 30. Remember they're playing 10 less games this year.
We've been trying to reach you about your car's extended warranty.

***Official 2022 Froob Brackets Participant***
User avatar
Philo Beddoe
Posts: 7080
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2017 10:11 pm
Contact:

Re: Timberwolves over/under at 27.5 wins

Post by Philo Beddoe »

I am going to put $200 on it. This way I will get all pissed off when they lose.
Reigning Rube Chat Bracket Champion
User avatar
Style
Posts: 4349
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2017 9:57 am

Re: Timberwolves over/under at 27.5 wins

Post by Style »

Under.
“Juiceless = useless” - Pat Fitzgerald
User avatar
jffl_commish
Posts: 23132
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2018 6:33 am

Re: Timberwolves over/under at 27.5 wins

Post by jffl_commish »

Any idea where the 10 fewer games are getting chopped from? Eastern Conference games? Division games? As long as they aren't losing Eastern conference games, 33.
Let's get Tropical
User avatar
Philo Beddoe
Posts: 7080
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2017 10:11 pm
Contact:

Re: Timberwolves over/under at 27.5 wins

Post by Philo Beddoe »

jffl_commish wrote: Mon Nov 23, 2020 11:25 am Any idea where the 10 fewer games are getting chopped from? Eastern Conference games? Division games? As long as they aren't losing Eastern conference games, 33.
You play everyone in your conference 3 times and everyone in the other conference 2 times.
Reigning Rube Chat Bracket Champion
User avatar
Sid Hartman
Posts: 6366
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2017 10:29 pm
Location: Heaven

Re: Timberwolves over/under at 27.5 wins

Post by Sid Hartman »

Philo Beddoe wrote: Mon Nov 23, 2020 11:34 am
jffl_commish wrote: Mon Nov 23, 2020 11:25 am Any idea where the 10 fewer games are getting chopped from? Eastern Conference games? Division games? As long as they aren't losing Eastern conference games, 33.
You play everyone in your conference 3 times and everyone in the other conference 2 times.
In that case 27.5 I take the over
Zimmer1: seriously you were the sperm that won?
User avatar
j2j
Posts: 27781
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2017 10:43 pm

Re: Timberwolves over/under at 27.5 wins

Post by j2j »

So they cut 10 games from within the conference. Honestly that seems like a stupid way to do it. The should have used this season to test out a more pod based system and 1-16 playoff seeding.

If they're going to try and fit 72 games into a shorter period of time, plus maybe a play-in tournament? At least cut down travel by going with the 5 division model.
We've been trying to reach you about your car's extended warranty.

***Official 2022 Froob Brackets Participant***
SO_MONEY
Posts: 6737
Joined: Fri May 11, 2018 3:13 pm

Re: Timberwolves over/under at 27.5 wins

Post by SO_MONEY »

Man that is really close. With a shorter season, things needing to work out just right, avoid injuries and infections. I would say 28 wins, so I go with the over, but a half game margin, I avoid that bet if you are talking real money.
User avatar
memyworld
Posts: 1660
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 9:23 am
Location: Sioux Falls

Re: Timberwolves over/under at 27.5 wins

Post by memyworld »

For reference, 28 wins in a 72-game season would translate to 30 wins in an 82-game season (39%).
User avatar
TrueBlue
Posts: 1701
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:27 am

Re: Timberwolves over/under at 27.5 wins

Post by TrueBlue »

Seems about right. I suppose I'd say 30ish, but im a homer so...
Spoiler:
Image
User avatar
memyworld
Posts: 1660
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 9:23 am
Location: Sioux Falls

Re: Timberwolves over/under at 27.5 wins

Post by memyworld »

j2j wrote: Mon Nov 23, 2020 11:40 am So they cut 10 games from within the conference. Honestly that seems like a stupid way to do it. The should have used this season to test out a more pod based system and 1-16 playoff seeding.

If they're going to try and fit 72 games into a shorter period of time, plus maybe a play-in tournament? At least cut down travel by going with the 5 division model.
It's sort of a perfect model, though, without losing too many games: 3 conference games per team, 2 non-conference per team.

If you want an equitable 16-team playoff structure, you have to go with the Premier League-type model where it's home and away vs. everyone, but that's only 58 games. Great for fresh legs but poor for revenue.
User avatar
weimy froob
Posts: 90157
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 11:10 am

Re: Timberwolves over/under at 27.5 wins

Post by weimy froob »

i think the bet is on the over. good luck philo!
User avatar
YBBR
Posts: 30496
Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2017 12:49 pm

Re: Timberwolves over/under at 27.5 wins

Post by YBBR »

No major injuries this year and they got a good shot at it.

Dlo and Towns have still played like one game together, right?
"Come up off your smooth talk player, this raspy. You stuck on Morse code player, this ASCII."
jodaman01
#1 Tom Thibodeau Fan
Posts: 8870
Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2017 9:06 am

Re: Timberwolves over/under at 27.5 wins

Post by jodaman01 »

I’ll go with the OVER.

GO WOLVES!! :thumbsup:
thinktank
Posts: 26739
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:43 am

Re: Timberwolves over/under at 27.5 wins

Post by thinktank »

memyworld wrote: Mon Nov 23, 2020 1:42 pm For reference, 28 wins in a 72-game season would translate to 30 wins in an 82-game season (39%).
31.6 games.

I'll take the over.

Honestly thinking about betting on that.
User avatar
Philo Beddoe
Posts: 7080
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2017 10:11 pm
Contact:

Re: Timberwolves over/under at 27.5 wins

Post by Philo Beddoe »

The over under is 27.5 on short season.
Reigning Rube Chat Bracket Champion
User avatar
bubu dubu.
Posts: 13485
Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2017 5:21 pm

Re: Timberwolves over/under at 27.5 wins

Post by bubu dubu. »

Philo Beddoe wrote: Mon Nov 23, 2020 11:16 am I am going to put $200 on it. This way I will get all pissed off when they lose.
smart
RubeTube
***Official Gibby Award Winner - November 2018***
Posts: 44415
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 2:10 pm

Re: Timberwolves over/under at 27.5 wins

Post by RubeTube »

They have the number set right. That's right around where they will be.

I say in 82 game season that they win 35.
“We are nonviolent with people who are nonviolent with us.”
— Malcolm X

The Puppet Master
HeHateMe
KFAN Rube Chat Hall of Fame Member
Posts: 15873
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2017 1:38 pm

Re: Timberwolves over/under at 27.5 wins

Post by HeHateMe »

Historically if you bet on the under with the Wolves you win a LOT!
thinktank wrote: Tue Feb 05, 2019 10:15 am I’m a successful consultant for some of the biggest and best companies in the world. I tell you about systems architecture, not the other way around.
User avatar
Bob Wiley
Posts: 11387
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2017 1:44 pm

Re: Timberwolves over/under at 27.5 wins

Post by Bob Wiley »

I’ll take the over.
"Dude, my IQ and education level is a 1,000 times more than yours. I whip everyone's ass here and they cannot hold a candle to me." mlhouse
User avatar
witljon
Posts: 16240
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2018 11:57 am

Re: Timberwolves over/under at 27.5 wins

Post by witljon »

HeHateMe wrote: Mon Nov 23, 2020 4:48 pm Historically if you bet on the under with the Wolves you win a LOT!
But we always should be optimistic....
User avatar
LordNu
Posts: 10589
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2017 2:15 am

Re: Timberwolves over/under at 27.5 wins

Post by LordNu »

How much they paying for the championship?
Stork311
Posts: 1955
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2017 8:02 am

Re: Timberwolves over/under at 27.5 wins

Post by Stork311 »

Over. With confidence.
User avatar
flexbuffchest
Posts: 26115
Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2017 12:08 pm

Re: Timberwolves over/under at 27.5 wins

Post by flexbuffchest »

Over

Edit: FOrogt it was only a 72 win season...I'll have to think this over some.
“We will protect the fanbase from Glen Taylor” -Alex Rodriguez.

Marc Lore - “I don’t care if that wrinkly old chicken roaster has a few more hairs on his head than I do, a deal is a deal.”
User avatar
Beef Supreme
Posts: 71135
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2017 11:49 pm
Location: House of Representin'

Re: Timberwolves over/under at 27.5 wins

Post by Beef Supreme »

My first instinct was over easy and I was going to be insulted.


But yeah... shorter season... I still take the over, but am less insulted.
“When stupidity is considered patriotism, it is unsafe to be intelligent.”

- Isaac Asimov
User avatar
bubu dubu.
Posts: 13485
Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2017 5:21 pm

Re: Timberwolves over/under at 27.5 wins

Post by bubu dubu. »

Wolves were 4-10 after all the trades. Equal to about a 29% win rate. Probably a little misleading, as KAT and DLO only played 1 game together. If they do play most of the season together, is that good enough to increase the win percentage that much? Cause they havent really improved the team much elsewhere.

Another thing the Wolves have going against them in the over/under, is that they have shown they aren't afraid to tank, so if things go south after the ASB (will there even be an ASG this year?), theres going to be some curious injuries that sideline our best players, and they will put up the least competitive team they can.
User avatar
somuchyummy
Posts: 27175
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2017 9:14 pm

Re: Timberwolves over/under at 27.5 wins

Post by somuchyummy »

bubu dubu. wrote: Mon Nov 23, 2020 8:19 pm Wolves were 4-10 after all the trades. Equal to about a 29% win rate. Probably a little misleading, as KAT and DLO only played 1 game together. If they do play most of the season together, is that good enough to increase the win percentage that much? Cause they havent really improved the team much elsewhere.

Another thing the Wolves have going against them in the over/under, is that they have shown they aren't afraid to tank, so if things go south after the ASB (will there even be an ASG this year?), theres going to be some curious injuries that sideline our best players, and they will put up the least competitive team they can.
but we have no picks next year. however, that would be very timberwolf-like. tank in a year with no picks.
There is little difference between the memory of a real event and the memory of a dream.
User avatar
bubu dubu.
Posts: 13485
Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2017 5:21 pm

Re: Timberwolves over/under at 27.5 wins

Post by bubu dubu. »

somuchyummy wrote: Mon Nov 23, 2020 9:03 pm
bubu dubu. wrote: Mon Nov 23, 2020 8:19 pm Wolves were 4-10 after all the trades. Equal to about a 29% win rate. Probably a little misleading, as KAT and DLO only played 1 game together. If they do play most of the season together, is that good enough to increase the win percentage that much? Cause they havent really improved the team much elsewhere.

Another thing the Wolves have going against them in the over/under, is that they have shown they aren't afraid to tank, so if things go south after the ASB (will there even be an ASG this year?), theres going to be some curious injuries that sideline our best players, and they will put up the least competitive team they can.
but we have no picks next year. however, that would be very timberwolf-like. tank in a year with no picks.
ah, good point. I forgot about that. That definitely is a positive for the over crowd.
thinktank
Posts: 26739
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:43 am

Re: Timberwolves over/under at 27.5 wins

Post by thinktank »

HeHateMe wrote: Mon Nov 23, 2020 4:48 pm Historically if you bet on the under with the Wolves you win a LOT!
You also don’t bet on them winning two #1 picks in 5 years.
Post Reply