Note to guests/lurkers of this site. To continue reading content on some of our boards you will need to create an account.

Registration is free and easy, just remember your password and check back after your account has been approved by an administrator.

Please use the "contact us" link at the bottom of the page if you have any issues.

Predict what happens with the Wolves lottery pick

A place to discuss the MN Timberwolves
Thrillkill
Posts: 9760
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2017 12:26 pm

Re: Predict what happens with the Wolves lottery pick

Post by Thrillkill »

thinktank wrote: Fri Jul 10, 2020 8:19 pm
Thrillkill wrote: Fri Jul 10, 2020 6:13 pm
thinktank wrote: Thu Jul 09, 2020 1:40 pm

Thrillkill, whether you like it or not, Rosas is one of 30 GMs and the first Latino GM.

Always calling him an idiot makes you look like a bigger idiot than Rosas could ever be.
:lol: He's the first latino GM so his idiocy is somehow mitigated? :lol: Jesus fuck.

He's a self absorbed idiot who copies his old team without understanding why their system worked (in the regular season) and claims to have revolutionized the NBA in one year................of never winning. And his first move was to absolutely fuck himself publicly at the draft when he was going to outsmart the entire old fashioned backward ass league who just don't understand how the new NBA works and he got his latino pants pulled down for a public spanking. And then he congratulated himself on a big win. Yep, the guy who thinks 3 attempts, not makes, ATTEMPTS, are more important than made 2's. IDIOT!
The better explanation is you’re psycho.

Rosas hasn’t claimed to revolutionize anything.

And now you wanna keep Culver so...

:zzz:
Or maybe that you are the same obfuscating, subject changing, argue the argument, rube who is over his head in any basketball conversation, desperately trying and failing to look as if you aren't.

Rosas has constantly claimed to be revolutionizing EVERYTHING. He claims victory on every move. He claims that system is all. Then claims we don't have the players when we lose. Then gets a bunch of new players and claims positions are meaningless just system matters. Then claims we need to make more moves when we lose. Claiming victory at every turn while the Wolves claim actual victories once every 15 games. Apparently that math is hard for you too.

And I want to keep Culver because we can get nothing for him and he's one of the 2-3 guys on this team of winners who actually plays D. Not that the idiot values that. And in your 3rd grade level mind you now see that as me validating the idiot's move to trade up 3 hours too early, not get his guy, then take a guy he didn't want because he would just rape some stupid GM later with his revolutionary GM genius, and then being stuck with a guy who can't do the only thing he wants and has strengths he utterly doesn't value. But that's a good pick now right? Trading up for a solid role player on a team that doesn't value that role? You really got me on that one. :lol:

Tanking another attempt at thinking.
Post Reply