What's sad is Peyton Manning with an equally terrible roster could get his team to at least 12 wins and/or into the playoffs constantly.
Aaron Rodgers can not.
P Manning > A. Rodgers. At this point you could even say E. Manning is more accomplished than A. Rodgers.
No one would say E. Manning is a top 10 all time QB would they? I don't think so.
packfaninvikeland wrote: ↑Tue Dec 18, 2018 9:51 pm
That being said, we are a year removed from getting rid of our DC, and a handful of other roster changes and staff. I dont think our roster is shit at all, I think its below average. I'd like to see what a healthy Packers team can do. Enjoy the Packers reloading struggling period, it wont last long. [/b]
There are pieces. We've already seen the Packer defense make strides in certain areas. If I'm being serious and side stepping the division rivalry between Packer and Viking fans, I'm worried about Rodgers having a defense in a couple years to finish out his career and make a serious push for a 2nd superbowl win.
I don't think the head coaching decision even matters because this is Aaron's team now. Just as he wanted it. His plan to get MM fired worked (No, I can't believe that Rodgers has just been this terrible (respectively) the last few years).
It's been 32 years since one of MN's four major sports teams has been to the Championship/Superbowl.
Every single year is failure until we win one. 4 teams, 32 years. That's roughly 128 consecutive failed seasons.
What's sad is Peyton Manning with an equally terrible roster could get his team to at least 12 wins and/or into the playoffs constantly.
Aaron Rodgers can not.
P Manning > A. Rodgers. At this point you could even say E. Manning is more accomplished than A. Rodgers.
No one would say E. Manning is a top 10 all time QB would they? I don't think so.
Insane you actually believe that.
#Cantfixstupid
The Colts were not that good around Manning. Sorry.
It's been 32 years since one of MN's four major sports teams has been to the Championship/Superbowl.
Every single year is failure until we win one. 4 teams, 32 years. That's roughly 128 consecutive failed seasons.
packfaninvikeland wrote: ↑Tue Dec 18, 2018 9:51 pm
That being said, we are a year removed from getting rid of our DC, and a handful of other roster changes and staff. I dont think our roster is shit at all, I think its below average. I'd like to see what a healthy Packers team can do. Enjoy the Packers reloading struggling period, it wont last long. [/b]
There are pieces. We've already seen the Packer defense make strides in certain areas. If I'm being serious and side stepping the division rivalry between Packer and Viking fans, I'm worried about Rodgers having a defense in a couple years to finish out his career and make a serious push for a 2nd superbowl win.
I don't think the head coaching decision even matters because this is Aaron's team now. Just as he wanted it. His plan to get MM fired worked (No, I can't believe that Rodgers has just been this terrible (respectively) the last few years).
You have a CEO who was a marginal player at best and a new GM who rides Dad's coat tails even though Dad wasn't much. Good luck going forward.
Still laughing dickwad? The Packers do have a terrible roster. It's taken a Hall of Fame QB just to get them to five wins through 14 games. It's an atrocious reflection on the rest of the roster, it just is. When are fools like you and Chuck going to accept reality?
Um yep. I am still laughing at you dolts. You guys cry and complain when we bump old threads, but of course, how convenient its ok when you guys do it. Adding to your 3 new threads a week saying the same corny old shit you guys say every week. So yea, I still laugh at you.
That being said, we are a year removed from getting rid of our DC, and a handful of other roster changes and staff. I dont think our roster is shit at all, I think its below average. I'd like to see what a healthy Packers team can do. Enjoy the Packers reloading struggling period, it wont last long.
[/quote]
Z
[/b]
