Yes, Houston has a talented farm systembubu dubu. wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 10:15 pmWill they crack the Twins top 30?Rock Me Abbrederis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 10:06 pm P Jorge Alcala and OF Gilberto Celestino to the Twins for Pressly, the Astros No. 10 and No. 15 prospects according to MLB Pipeline...
I'm also curious how many players in a top 30 outside of like the top 5 guys (which no one we added today is) end up being serviceable MLB players. 2 or 3 would be my guess, but I'm shooting in the dark. What are the chances any of the 5 guys (4 who will likely be in the Twins top 30) added today make an impact some day?
Note to guests/lurkers of this site. To continue reading content on some of our boards you will need to create an account.
Registration is free and easy, just remember your password and check back after your account has been approved by an administrator.
Please use the "contact us" link at the bottom of the page if you have any issues.
Registration is free and easy, just remember your password and check back after your account has been approved by an administrator.
Please use the "contact us" link at the bottom of the page if you have any issues.
MLB trade discussion.......Its on!
-
- Posts: 2120
- Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2017 12:08 pm
- Contact:
Re: MLB trade discussion.......Its on!
- bubu dubu.
- Posts: 13485
- Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2017 5:21 pm
Re: MLB trade discussion.......Its on!
From my understanding, both of the pitchers added today are flame throwers who are described as having great arms, but who's potential greatly rely on complimentary pitches, which they havent developed yet. Even if they don't develop complimentary pitches, there is always room for heat throwers in the BP.
-
- Posts: 2120
- Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2017 12:08 pm
- Contact:
Re: MLB trade discussion.......Its on!
He hasn't been all that great....an ERA of 4.32 and a WHIP of 1.56. I will say, though, he hasn't been scored upon in his last six appearances (8.1 innings)...bubu dubu. wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 10:22 pmstraight from his mouth when I ran into him before Spring Training, he said the plan explained to him was for him to be with the team in late May...clearly, that didnt happen. Not sure what the hold up is/was.Ron Burgundy 4 President wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 10:16 pm How's Trevor May looking? Can we expect to see him up here anytime soon?
- bubu dubu.
- Posts: 13485
- Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2017 5:21 pm
Re: MLB trade discussion.......Its on!
I agree with most of what you said, other than that there might be an indication of quantity over quality. Not sure what kind of quality guys they were going to pull in for the guys traded so far.Ron Burgundy 4 President wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 10:26 pm If these two trades are any indication of the overall plan, it seems as though they are more interested in quantity than quality. Chances are that individually, most of these guys won't ever play in an MLB game, but I think they think if they get 8-10 of these types of guys at this deadline that they'll strike gold once, and maybe find another serviceable player or two in the mix that will at least give them something.
If Dozier gets moved, and the Twins don't receive a top 60ish prospect, then I think there's something to the quantity over quality aspect.
- bubu dubu.
- Posts: 13485
- Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2017 5:21 pm
Re: MLB trade discussion.......Its on!
Saw they threw some starts at him this year too. Maybe that plays a factor into how he's performed. Not sure what his numbers are in starts vs relief, but I'm guessing better in relief.Rock Me Abbrederis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 10:30 pmHe hasn't been all that great....an ERA of 4.32 and a WHIP of 1.56. I will say, though, he hasn't been scored upon in his last six appearances (8.1 innings)...bubu dubu. wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 10:22 pmstraight from his mouth when I ran into him before Spring Training, he said the plan explained to him was for him to be with the team in late May...clearly, that didnt happen. Not sure what the hold up is/was.Ron Burgundy 4 President wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 10:16 pm How's Trevor May looking? Can we expect to see him up here anytime soon?
- Ron Burgundy 4 President
- Posts: 4608
- Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2017 4:51 pm
Re: MLB trade discussion.......Its on!
Those are better numbers then the ones I saw from him about three weeks ago, but still obviously not all that impressive. Hard to believe he won't get a look up here sometime relatively soon though with the Pressley trade and the white flag getting run up the pole though.Rock Me Abbrederis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 10:30 pmHe hasn't been all that great....an ERA of 4.32 and a WHIP of 1.56. I will say, though, he hasn't been scored upon in his last six appearances (8.1 innings)...bubu dubu. wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 10:22 pmstraight from his mouth when I ran into him before Spring Training, he said the plan explained to him was for him to be with the team in late May...clearly, that didnt happen. Not sure what the hold up is/was.Ron Burgundy 4 President wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 10:16 pm How's Trevor May looking? Can we expect to see him up here anytime soon?
-
- Posts: 2120
- Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2017 12:08 pm
- Contact:
Re: MLB trade discussion.......Its on!
It would not surprise me to see Rodney and Duke gone too. May, Moya and Addison Reed may be the ones brought up to replace them. And for the love of God, bring Alan Busenitz back up and DFA Belisle...Ron Burgundy 4 President wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 10:36 pmThose are better numbers then the ones I saw from him about three weeks ago, but still obviously not all that impressive. Hard to believe he won't get a look up here sometime relatively soon though with the Pressley trade and the white flag getting run up the pole though.Rock Me Abbrederis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 10:30 pmHe hasn't been all that great....an ERA of 4.32 and a WHIP of 1.56. I will say, though, he hasn't been scored upon in his last six appearances (8.1 innings)...bubu dubu. wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 10:22 pm
straight from his mouth when I ran into him before Spring Training, he said the plan explained to him was for him to be with the team in late May...clearly, that didnt happen. Not sure what the hold up is/was.
- Ron Burgundy 4 President
- Posts: 4608
- Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2017 4:51 pm
Re: MLB trade discussion.......Its on!
I should have also mentioned that the Garcia trade that they made to the Yankees and got 2 similar type pitching prospects last year also kind of steered me in that direction as well. It's also possible that the Twins simply think that most of these guys are more valuable than the teams that are trading them do. In other words for example, maybe the Twins just liked AZ's 11th rated prospect as much or almost as much as their 6 or 7th rated prospect so they were willing to accept that with the other two guys thrown in the sweeten the pot as well.bubu dubu. wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 10:32 pmI agree with most of what you said, other than that there might be an indication of quantity over quality. Not sure what kind of quality guys they were going to pull in for the guys traded so far.Ron Burgundy 4 President wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 10:26 pm If these two trades are any indication of the overall plan, it seems as though they are more interested in quantity than quality. Chances are that individually, most of these guys won't ever play in an MLB game, but I think they think if they get 8-10 of these types of guys at this deadline that they'll strike gold once, and maybe find another serviceable player or two in the mix that will at least give them something.
If Dozier gets moved, and the Twins don't receive a top 60ish prospect, then I think there's something to the quantity over quality aspect.
Now admittedly, I am a bit more familiar with the NHL, so perhaps my knowledge of the latest trends in these types of transactions in that league is causing me to view this differently than I otherwise would.
- Ash Ketchum
- Posts: 7922
- Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2017 9:11 pm
Re: MLB trade discussion.......Its on!
Where is Dozier rumored to be going?
Any news?
Any news?
-
- Posts: 2120
- Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2017 12:08 pm
- Contact:
Re: MLB trade discussion.......Its on!
Nothing yet, I don't think. Milwaukee/Boston are still in on him, although Milwaukee is trying to get Mike Moustakas. It could end up being like in 2004 when the Twins dealt Doug Mientkiewicz to Boston when the Red Sox were in town...
-
- Posts: 6135
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 9:35 pm
- Location: Minneapolis
Re: MLB trade discussion.......Its on!
I assumed, and even said here...I assumed they were activating Reed and DFA Belisle..Rock Me Abbrederis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 10:39 pmIt would not surprise me to see Rodney and Duke gone too. May, Moya and Addison Reed may be the ones brought up to replace them. And for the love of God, bring Alan Busenitz back up and DFA Belisle...Ron Burgundy 4 President wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 10:36 pmThose are better numbers then the ones I saw from him about three weeks ago, but still obviously not all that impressive. Hard to believe he won't get a look up here sometime relatively soon though with the Pressley trade and the white flag getting run up the pole though.Rock Me Abbrederis wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 10:30 pm
He hasn't been all that great....an ERA of 4.32 and a WHIP of 1.56. I will say, though, he hasn't been scored upon in his last six appearances (8.1 innings)...
The minor rehab thing caught everyone by surprise I think.
(And Rock Me, thank you for the input in this thread....
I'm sure these won't be the only 2 moves the Twins make b4 the deadline, and your takes on prospects they get back is valuable)
Last edited by jakazz30 on Fri Jul 27, 2018 11:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- bubu dubu.
- Posts: 13485
- Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2017 5:21 pm
Re: MLB trade discussion.......Its on!
I feel 6th or 7th guys are hard to get...thats what I would expect for Dozier.Ron Burgundy 4 President wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 10:44 pmI should have also mentioned that the Garcia trade that they made to the Yankees and got 2 similar type pitching prospects last year also kind of steered me in that direction as well. It's also possible that the Twins simply think that most of these guys are more valuable than the teams that are trading them do. In other words for example, maybe the Twins just liked AZ's 11th rated prospect as much or almost as much as their 6 or 7th rated prospect so they were willing to accept that with the other two guys thrown in the sweeten the pot as well.bubu dubu. wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 10:32 pmI agree with most of what you said, other than that there might be an indication of quantity over quality. Not sure what kind of quality guys they were going to pull in for the guys traded so far.Ron Burgundy 4 President wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 10:26 pm If these two trades are any indication of the overall plan, it seems as though they are more interested in quantity than quality. Chances are that individually, most of these guys won't ever play in an MLB game, but I think they think if they get 8-10 of these types of guys at this deadline that they'll strike gold once, and maybe find another serviceable player or two in the mix that will at least give them something.
If Dozier gets moved, and the Twins don't receive a top 60ish prospect, then I think there's something to the quantity over quality aspect.
Now admittedly, I am a bit more familiar with the NHL, so perhaps my knowledge of the latest trends in these types of transactions in that league is causing me to view this differently than I otherwise would.
starting around #10, thats where guys are just peanuts. I imagine a phone call going like this...
Twins: We want your #6 guy.
Arizona: We want Eduardo, but you arent getting that much for him
T: Alright, we like your number #11 guy
A: sure, done deal
T: Throw in #19 too
A: of course, why not. So we have a deal?
T: Throw in player X too
A: yep, no problem
Imagine the reversal of the Twins being a contender and trying to acquire a rental...no way they are giving up Gonzalves or Larnach or Rooker, but...you want Baddoo and Blackenhorn? sure no problem. Oh, you want Wells also? yep, you can have him too.
IMO no team is giving up a top of the top prospect for Pressly/Garcia or EE. There could be the argument that if you arent getting a top prospect back, you might as well keep those guys. With a market like the Twins though, the factor of having to re-sign those guys might be the issue.
- Ron Burgundy 4 President
- Posts: 4608
- Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2017 4:51 pm
Re: MLB trade discussion.......Its on!
That makes sense. I get that teams don't want to give up their top 10 prospects, even for a pretty decent upgrade for the now, even if it's relatively short term, but what I always find funny is that there isn't a team out there of the 30 whose top 10 right now will all end up being great or even serviceable MLB players, it just won't happen. A good percentage will be outright busts, and a good percentage of those that aren't will be serviceable (at best) MLB players. Years ago, maybe even a decade ago, I remember the Twins allegedly being in on Adrian Beltre, but they wanted our 2nd best pitching prospect at the time (Brian Duensing) so of course, the Twins said no way. I'll admit that's a cherry picked example, but still. I wonder how many GM's are kicking themselves years later because they didn't pull the trigger at a short term upgrade when doing so would have meant parting with that organizations version of Brian Duensing?bubu dubu. wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 11:04 pmI feel 6th or 7th guys are hard to get...thats what I would expect for Dozier.Ron Burgundy 4 President wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 10:44 pmI should have also mentioned that the Garcia trade that they made to the Yankees and got 2 similar type pitching prospects last year also kind of steered me in that direction as well. It's also possible that the Twins simply think that most of these guys are more valuable than the teams that are trading them do. In other words for example, maybe the Twins just liked AZ's 11th rated prospect as much or almost as much as their 6 or 7th rated prospect so they were willing to accept that with the other two guys thrown in the sweeten the pot as well.bubu dubu. wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 10:32 pm
I agree with most of what you said, other than that there might be an indication of quantity over quality. Not sure what kind of quality guys they were going to pull in for the guys traded so far.
If Dozier gets moved, and the Twins don't receive a top 60ish prospect, then I think there's something to the quantity over quality aspect.
Now admittedly, I am a bit more familiar with the NHL, so perhaps my knowledge of the latest trends in these types of transactions in that league is causing me to view this differently than I otherwise would.
starting around #10, thats where guys are just peanuts. I imagine a phone call going like this...
Twins: We want your #6 guy.
Arizona: We want Eduardo, but you arent getting that much for him
T: Alright, we like your number #11 guy
A: sure, done deal
T: Throw in #19 too
A: of course, why not. So we have a deal?
T: Throw in player X too
A: yep, no problem
Imagine the reversal of the Twins being a contender and trying to acquire a rental...no way they are giving up Gonzalves or Larnach or Rooker, but...you want Baddoo and Blackenhorn? sure no problem. Oh, you want Wells also? yep, you can have him too.
IMO no team is giving up a top of the top prospect for Pressly/Garcia or EE. There could be the argument that if you arent getting a top prospect back, you might as well keep those guys. With a market like the Twins though, the factor of having to re-sign those guys might be the issue.
Again, being a bit more familiar with the NHL I can tell you that GM's are more willing to accept that there will be a decent amount of busts even in a group of very promising young prospects and the transactions they collectively make I think are pretty well reflected in their understanding of that reality and eventuality.
Last edited by Ron Burgundy 4 President on Fri Jul 27, 2018 11:45 pm, edited 3 times in total.
-
- Posts: 2120
- Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2017 12:08 pm
- Contact:
Re: MLB trade discussion.......Its on!
Even with the trades, this could be an entertaining lineup to watch
-
- Posts: 6135
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 9:35 pm
- Location: Minneapolis
Re: MLB trade discussion.......Its on!
Love this thread......
It's been great baseball discussion basically without bs.
I have a feeling that there is going to be at least 2 more moves by the Twins before the deadline..(I think they would like 3, but I'm just not sure if the market is interested)
It's been great baseball discussion basically without bs.
I have a feeling that there is going to be at least 2 more moves by the Twins before the deadline..(I think they would like 3, but I'm just not sure if the market is interested)
-
- Posts: 2120
- Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2017 12:08 pm
- Contact:
Re: MLB trade discussion.......Its on!
Mike Moustakas to the Brew Crew
- feekdogg
- Posts: 29341
- Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2017 8:56 pm
Re: MLB trade discussion.......Its on!
Huh. Shaw has been decent. Neither of those guys can play 2B or SS and there's no DH.
Is it down to Boston or LA for Dozier? Or is Milwaukee still in?
-
- Posts: 2120
- Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2017 12:08 pm
- Contact:
Re: MLB trade discussion.......Its on!
-
- Posts: 4508
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2017 8:50 am
Re: MLB trade discussion.......Its on!
Amazing pickup for the Brewers.
Too Bad I Have To Destroy You Now
-
- Posts: 2120
- Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2017 12:08 pm
- Contact:
Re: MLB trade discussion.......Its on!
The guys who are left who I think could be traded are:
Brian Dozier
Lance Lynn
Ervin Santana (although it would not be until August, I am guessing, if he is moved)
Zach Duke
Fernando Rodney
Logan Morrison
Kyle Gibson (although I doubt it, unless we get a haul)
Brian Dozier
Lance Lynn
Ervin Santana (although it would not be until August, I am guessing, if he is moved)
Zach Duke
Fernando Rodney
Logan Morrison
Kyle Gibson (although I doubt it, unless we get a haul)
- bubu dubu.
- Posts: 13485
- Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2017 5:21 pm
Re: MLB trade discussion.......Its on!
Updated Twins prospect list according to MLB, with players received from the two trades.
Alcala was #10 in Houston, #11 here.
Gilberto Celestino #15 for the Stos, #14 here
Gabriel Maciel #11 for Arizona, #17 here
Jhoan Duran #19 in Arizona, #22 here
Kind of surprising to me that they got more for Pressly than EE
Alcala was #10 in Houston, #11 here.
Gilberto Celestino #15 for the Stos, #14 here
Gabriel Maciel #11 for Arizona, #17 here
Jhoan Duran #19 in Arizona, #22 here
Kind of surprising to me that they got more for Pressly than EE
-
- Posts: 6135
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 9:35 pm
- Location: Minneapolis
Re: MLB trade discussion.......Its on!
I'm guessing it's a combo of reasons why Pressly got a better return: there's always a higher demand for pitching, he's under team control still in 2019 (arbitration eligibility though), etc..bubu dubu. wrote: ↑Sat Jul 28, 2018 12:36 pm Updated Twins prospect list according to MLB, with players received from the two trades.
Alcala was #10 in Houston, #11 here.
Gilberto Celestino #15 for the Stos, #14 here
Gabriel Maciel #11 for Arizona, #17 here
Jhoan Duran #19 in Arizona, #22 here
Kind of surprising to me that they got more for Pressly than EE
I just wonder if Dozier is going to be traded now... the market is disappearing for him. (And judging by his little comments yesterday after the Escobar trade, I can say that him resigning here is no longer on the table)
At this point, the Twins might just take about anything for him.
- ForCaleb
- Posts: 67404
- Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2017 3:29 pm
Re: MLB trade discussion.......Its on!
This is what is really confusing to me. I'm looking these trades, and the prospects we're getting aren't bad. But you're right, I think the Pressly deal got the better return.bubu dubu. wrote: ↑Sat Jul 28, 2018 12:36 pm Updated Twins prospect list according to MLB, with players received from the two trades.
Alcala was #10 in Houston, #11 here.
Gilberto Celestino #15 for the Stos, #14 here
Gabriel Maciel #11 for Arizona, #17 here
Jhoan Duran #19 in Arizona, #22 here
Kind of surprising to me that they got more for Pressly than EE
- Miley Cyrus
- Posts: 2528
- Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2017 10:51 pm
Re: MLB trade discussion.......Its on!
With Kinsler to the BoSox, maybe we'll get to see Dozy's gorgeous head of hair for the foreseeable future.
- feekdogg
- Posts: 29341
- Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2017 8:56 pm
Re: MLB trade discussion.......Its on!
The only team left that makes any sense is LA. I think he's going to stay here.Miley Cyrus wrote: ↑Mon Jul 30, 2018 10:42 pm With Kinsler to the BoSox, maybe we'll get to see Dozy's gorgeous head of hair for the foreseeable future.
- A Kickass Offense
- Posts: 4090
- Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2017 9:02 pm
Re: MLB trade discussion.......Its on!
I'm honestly not sure how much LA would even want him, they've got 4-5 guys that can play multiple infield positions and for the most part, they can all hit as well.feekdogg wrote: ↑Mon Jul 30, 2018 11:21 pmThe only team left that makes any sense is LA. I think he's going to stay here.Miley Cyrus wrote: ↑Mon Jul 30, 2018 10:42 pm With Kinsler to the BoSox, maybe we'll get to see Dozy's gorgeous head of hair for the foreseeable future.
- feekdogg
- Posts: 29341
- Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2017 8:56 pm
Re: MLB trade discussion.......Its on!
I know, but there's nobody else that makes any sense, unless an AL team would want him to DH. They either asked too much or they stupidly held out until the market fizzled out.A Kickass Offense wrote: ↑Mon Jul 30, 2018 11:27 pmI'm honestly not sure how much LA would even want him, they've got 4-5 guys that can play multiple infield positions and for the most part, they can all hit as well.feekdogg wrote: ↑Mon Jul 30, 2018 11:21 pmThe only team left that makes any sense is LA. I think he's going to stay here.Miley Cyrus wrote: ↑Mon Jul 30, 2018 10:42 pm With Kinsler to the BoSox, maybe we'll get to see Dozy's gorgeous head of hair for the foreseeable future.
- bubu dubu.
- Posts: 13485
- Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2017 5:21 pm
Re: MLB trade discussion.......Its on!
Zack Duke traded
-
- KFAN Rube Chat Hall of Fame Member
- Posts: 15873
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2017 1:38 pm
Re: MLB trade discussion.......Its on!
Anyone else surprised the Twins are getting recognizable names for guys like Duke and Lynn? De Jong and Austin are actually guys I know of!
- Style
- Posts: 4349
- Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2017 9:57 am
Re: MLB trade discussion.......Its on!
Two live bodies for Zach Duke is a surprise to me. The fact that you have heard of them is just the cherry on top!
“Juiceless = useless” - Pat Fitzgerald